ArticleTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2022
Blood pressure measurement in the elderly with atrial fibrillation: an observational study comparing different noninvasive sphygmomanometers.
Article in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has affected millions of adults in the world. It is important to monitor and manage blood pressure (BP) in AF patients. The accuracy of BP monitoring in AF patients with noninvasive methods remains questionable, however. Objectives: To compare the accuracy of different noninvasive BP devices (oscillographic sphygmomanometer and pulse wave device) for BP measurement in elderly patients with AF, with a mercury sphygmomanometer as a reference. Design: This study was an observational study. Methods: Patients with AF from the inpatient department of cardiology were included from 1 January to 31 December 2020. BP measurements were performed by two trained nurses using a tee junction connection on the cuff to connect three sphygmomanometers. The Bland-Altman plot analysis was conducted to compare the agreement of BP measurements. We also compared the agreement of BP measurements through metrics such as accuracy, bias, and precision. Results: A total of 202 patients (54.5% female) were included. The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed that the lower and upper limits of agreement (LoAs) of pulse wave/reference were similar to the predefined acceptable clinical limits (10/5 mmHg). The bias and precision in both systolic and diastolic BP were significantly less in pulse wave/reference (a bias of 1.8 and 0.77 mmHg and a precision of 5.20 and 4.66 mmHg, respectively), with corresponding higher accuracy readings (98.51% for P10 in systolic BP and 85.64% for P5 in diastolic BP). Conclusion: A novel noninvasive sphygmomanometer - pulse wave device has a good concordance with a mercury sphygmomanometer in BP monitoring, and may be applicable to perform BP measurements in the elderly with AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.