ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology
Comparison of outcomes between variceal and non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis: Insights from a Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 13-year nationwide analysis of outcomes of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in post-bariatric surgery patients.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mortality in Patients with Cirrhosis and Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding at an Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impact of left ventricular assist devices on 30-day readmission and outcomes in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide analysis.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (VUGIB) occurs in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, but non-VUGIB (NVUGIB) is not uncommon. We compared the outcomes of VUGIB and NVUGIB in cirrhotic patients. Methods: This retrospective study used Nationwide Inpatient Sample employing International Classification of Diseases codes for adult NVUGIB and VUGIB patients. Mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization were compared. Analyses were performed using STATA; proportions and continuous variables were compared using Fisher's exact and Student's t-test, respectively. Confounding variables were adjusted using propensity matching, multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses. Results: Of 2,166,194 cirrhotics, 92,439 had a diagnosis of NVUGIB and 17,620 VUGIB. VUGIB patients had higher rates of mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-1.69], hemorrhagic shock (aOR 1.84, 95%CI 1.54-2.17) and intensive care unit admission (aOR 2.47, 95%CI 2.18-2.81), greater hospitalization costs ($16,251 vs. $12,295, P<0.001), more need for packed red blood cell transfusion (aOR 1.12, 95%CI 1.03-1.22) or endoscopic therapy (aOR 2.71, 95%CI 2.47-2.93), and a longer hospital stay compared to NVUGIB. However, NVUGIB had higher aOR of undergoing diagnostic endoscopy and radiography-guided vessel embolization. There were no differences in the rates of acute kidney injury between the 2 groups. Ascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis were independently associated with increased VUGIB mortality. Conclusions: VUGIB in patients with cirrhosis is associated with greater hospital costs, mortality, and morbidity burden than NVUGIB. This study provides updated and current knowledge of patient characteristics and differences in outcomes between VUGIB and NVUGIB, required to successfully address the healthcare delivery gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.