Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36406897›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2022

Favorable Outcomes in Older Recipients Receiving Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplantation.

Pooja Budhiraja, Raymond L Heilman, Kunam S Reddy, Caroline C Jadlowiec, Hassan A Khamash, Jacob Ninan, Swetha Reddy, Hay Me Me, Suman Misra, Nitin Katariya and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pooja BudhirajaDivision of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
Raymond L HeilmanDivision of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
Kunam S ReddyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
Caroline C JadlowiecDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
Hassan A KhamashDivision of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
Jacob NinanDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Phoenix, AZ.
Swetha ReddyDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Phoenix, AZ.
Hay Me MeDivision of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
Suman MisraDivision of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
Nitin KatariyaDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
Harini A ChakkeraDivision of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of older (50-65 y) type 1 diabetics with body mass index <35 kg/m Methods: This is a retrospective single-center study from July 2003 to March 2021 with a median follow-up of 7.5 y. Results: There were 104 recipients in the SPKT and 80 in the LDKT group. The mean age was 56 y in SPKT and 58 y in LDKT. There were 55% male recipients in the SPKT group versus 75% in LDKT. The duration of diabetes was 32 y in SPKT versus 25 y in LDKT. The number of preemptive transplants and length of dialysis were similar. However, the wait time was shorter for LDKT (269 versus 460 d). Forty-nine percent of the LDKT recipients received the organ within 6 mo of being waitlisted compared with 28% of SPKT recipients ( Conclusions: SPKT in selected recipients aged 50 and above can have excellent outcomes similar to LDKT recipients.

Identifiers

PMID36406897
PMCPMC9671747
OpenAlexW4309263965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.