Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36406883›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2022

Re-evaluation of neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (E 959) as a food additive.

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), Maged Younes, Gabriele Aquilina, Laurence Castle, Gisela Degen, Karl-Heinz Engel, Paul J Fowler, Maria José Frutos Fernandez, Peter Fürst, Ursula Gundert-Remy and 29 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Flavouring group evaluation 420 (FGE.420): Hesperetin dihydrochalcone.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Re-evaluation of neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (E 959) as a food additive.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF)
Maged Younes
Gabriele Aquilina
Laurence Castle
Gisela Degen
Karl-Heinz Engel
Paul J Fowler
Maria José Frutos Fernandez
Peter Fürst
Ursula Gundert-Remy
Rainer Gürtler
Trine Husøy
Melania Manco
Wim Mennes
Peter Moldeus
Sabina Passamonti
Romina Shah
Ine Waalkens-Berendsen
Matthew Wright
Monika Batke
Polly Boon
Ellen Bruzell
James Chipman
Riccardo Crebelli
Rex FitzGerald
Cristina Fortes
Thorhallur Halldorsson
Jean-Charles LeBlanc
Oliver Lindtner
Alicja Mortensen
Evangelia Ntzani
Heather Wallace
Claudia Cascio
Consuelo Civitella
Zsuzsanna Horvath
Federica Lodi
Agnieszka Mech
Alexandra Tard
Giorgia Vianello

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present opinion deals with the re-evaluation of neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (E 959) when used as a food additive. It is obtained by catalytic hydrogenation of a flavanone - neohesperidine - which is naturally occurring and thus isolated by alcohol extraction in bitter oranges (

Indexed as

E 959food additiveneohesperidine dihydrochalconesweetener

Identifiers

PMID36406883
PMCPMC9669802
OpenAlexW4309616602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.