ArticleMicroelectronic engineering2023
Capacitive immunosensor for COVID-19 diagnosis.
Article in Microelectronic engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Perspective on Direct Binary Capacitance Detectors for Decision-Driven Biochemical and Lab-on-Chip Applications: A CMOS Cross-Coupled-Based Capacitance Detector.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Stamp-Imprinted Polymer EIS Biosensor for Amyloid-Beta Detection: A Novel Approach Towards Alzheimer's Screening.Biosensors · 2025Article
- IgY antibodies/Cysteamine: simple and effective methodology for electrochemical detection of SARS-CoV-2 S-protein.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2025Article
- Parkinson biomarker determination with an Au microflower-enhanced electrochemical immunosensor using non-Faradaic capacitance measurements.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Based on Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Its Integration into Nanomedicine and Microfluidic Devices as Point-of-Care Testing (POCT).International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 has spread worldwide and early detection has been the key to controlling its propagation and preventing severe cases. However, diagnostic devices must be developed using different strategies to avoid a shortage of supplies needed for tests' fabrication caused by their large demand in pandemic situations. Furthermore, some tropical and subtropical countries are also facing epidemics of Dengue and Zika, viruses with similar symptoms in early stages and cross-reactivity in serological tests. Herein, we reported a qualitative immunosensor based on capacitive detection of spike proteins of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19. The sensor device exhibited a good signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 1 kHz frequency, with an absolute value of capacitance variation significantly smaller for Dengue and Zika NS1 proteins (|ΔC| = 1.5 ± 1.0 nF and 1.8 ± 1.0 nF, respectively) than for the spike protein (|ΔC| = 7.0 ± 1.8 nF). Under the optimized conditions, the established biosensor is able to indicate that the sample contains target proteins when |ΔC| > 3.8 nF, as determined by the cut-off value (CO). This immunosensor was developed using interdigitated electrodes which require a measurement system with a simple electrical circuit that can be miniaturized to enable point-of-care detection, offering an alternative for COVID-19 diagnosis, especially in areas where there is also a co-incidence of Zika and Dengue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.