Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36406726›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Differences in acute pain perception between patients and physicians in the emergency department.

Malak Alotaibi, Muna Aljahany, Zaid Alhamdan, Mashael Alsaffar, Abdulrahman Almojally, Wajdan Alassaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of pain management strategies in acute infectious otologic conditions: a national survey of ENT trainees.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Malak AlotaibiDepartment of Emergency, Prince Mohammad bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muna AljahanyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Zaid AlhamdanDepartment of Emergency, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mashael AlsaffarDepartment of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlmojallyDepartment of Emergency, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Wajdan AlassafDepartment of Emergency, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pain is a subjective complaint that comprises a vast majority of emergency department (ED) visits. Owing to its subjectivity, pain reporting is prone to variations that could impact patient care. We aimed to determine the extent of differences in pain rating-scores between patients and their physicians in the ED and impact on patient satisfaction. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional sample of eligible patients was recruited from two centers in Saudi Arabia. Pain scorings were performed using validated online questionnaires during patients' ED stay. Results: Pain rating scores by physicians was lower than that by patients (6.3 ± 2.0 versus 7.0 ± 3.1, p = 0.004). Additionally, severe pain rating (8-10 rating) was given less frequently by physicians compared with that by patients (26.0% versus 48.1%, p = 0.004). Comparing the ratings by physicians with those by patients, underestimation was observed in 70.1%, overestimation in 16.9%, and matching rating in 13.0% cases. The most frequent analgesic medication administered was paracetamol (79.2%), followed by diclofenac (26.0%), morphine (10.4%), and ketorolac (9.1%). The medications were administered mainly intravenously (87.0%) and, to a lesser extent, intramuscularly (31.2%). Majority of patients (62.5%) reported not to have sufficient pain relief after treatment. Conclusion: Most physicians tend to underestimate the level of pain perceived by their patients, which often leads to under-treatment and lower patient satisfaction. The present study revealed a significant difference in pain ratings between patients and physicians.

Indexed as

Emergency departmentPain estimationPain score

Identifiers

PMID36406726
PMCPMC9667246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.