Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36406715›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Trusted-auditing chain: A security blockchain prototype used in agriculture traceability.

Moyixi Lei, Shuangyin Liu, Na Luo, Xinting Yang, Chuanheng Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enhancing Cancer Care through Blockchain Technology.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Moyixi LeiNational Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China.
Shuangyin LiuCollege of Information Science and Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.
Na LuoNational Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China.
Xinting YangNational Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China.
Chuanheng SunNational Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traceability systems have changed the way food safety is managed and data is stored. Blockchain tracking services now provide customers with an infrastructure that allows them to easily access data online. However, there are limitations to these new capabilities, such as a lack of transparency and the existence of privacy and security challenges. Additionally, as the need for more agile, private, and traceability secure data solutions continues to grow exponentially, rethinking the current structure of blockchain agricultural traceability is mission-critical for a country. By leveraging and building upon blockchain's unique attributes, including tamper-evident, security hash crypto-data, and distributed ledger, we have proposed a prototype that allows traceability data to be reliably stored via blockchain while simultaneously being secured, with completeness auditing to enhance credibility. The result, the trusted auditing chain (TA chain), is a flexible solution that assures data security and solves challenges such as scalability and privacy-preserving. The TA chain works through Schnorr-style non-interactive Zero-knowledge proof to support security automatical choose privacy augmented. In addition, The TA chain can audit more than 1000 transactions within 1ms, and its error stabilizes below the 250 μs, which proves a security and fair traceability system to assure that data is distributed and reliably, and provably audited.

Indexed as

Agricultural traceabilityBlockchainNon-interactive zero-knowledge proofPrivacy-preservingSecurity auditing

Identifiers

PMID36406715
PMCPMC9668534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.