ReviewHeliyon2022
A review on urban agriculture: technology, socio-economy, and policy.
Review in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The impact of herbal medicine development on the population health in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The emerging impact of CRISPR and gene editing on global crop improvement.Transgenic research · 2026Review
- Serological investigation ofOpen veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Biosecurity practices and their determining factors in commercial layer chickens in selected regions of Tanzania.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Urban vertical farming: innovation for food security and social impact?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- The optimal formulation of a readily compostable horticultural growing substrate for vertical farming was determined using design of experiments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Empowering vertical farming through IoT and AI-Driven technologies: A comprehensive review.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of farmers towards urban agroecology in Malaysia.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Privacy-Centric AI and IoT Solutions for Smart Rural Farm Monitoring and Control.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Linking Agricultural Activity Frequency to Loneliness in Rural Hospital Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Analysis of urban heat islands with landsat satellite images and GIS in Kuala Lumpur Metropolitan City.Heliyon · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been a challenge to support the expansion of urban agriculture (UA) in cities due to its poor economic profitability. However, it is also hard to deny the increasing benefits of UA in improving the socio-environmental dimension of cities. Hence, in this review, different aspects of UA were examined to highlight its value beyond profitability such as social, health and well-being, disaster risk reduction, and environmental perspectives. A case study and relevant policies were analyzed to determine how policy makers can bridge the gap between current and future UA practices and sustainable development. Bridging these policy gaps can help the UA sector to sustainably grow and become successfully integrated in cities. Moreover, advancements in UA technologies and plant biotechnology were presented as potential solutions in increasing the future profitability of commercial UA. Consequently, as new UA-related technologies evolve, the multidisciplinary nature of UA and its changing identity from agriculture to digital technology, similarly require adaptive policies. These policies should maximize the potential of UA in contributing to resiliency and sustainability and incentivize the organic integration of UA in cities, while equally serving social justice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.