Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36406673›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2022

Integrative review on psychological and social risk and prevention factors of eating disorders including anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: seven major theories.

Elise Zanella, Eunro Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elise ZanellaRMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Eunro LeeRMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
RMIT University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across the globe, disordered eating disorders alarmingly have increased by over 30% in the general public, as characterised by a wide range of eating, shape and weight concerns. Subsequent physical, functional, social, and mental health issues significantly burden society, conveying various personal sufferings to affected individuals. Disordered eating behaviours and cognitions can increase to clinical severity, such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. The present study critically reviewed over 100 major papers on disordered eating to integrate theoretical underpinnings and explore practical insights. The review resulted in identifying seven major theories concerning the development and persistence of disturbed eating behaviour. These include self-esteem theory, interpersonal theory, emotion regulation theory, executive function theory, social neuroscience theory, theory of mind, and trans-diagnostic theory. Furthermore, depression, anxiety, social norms and family functioning also emerged as major psychological and social correlates of disordered eating. The results further suggested significant research gaps and inconsistencies, including directional ambiguity between self-esteem and body dissatisfaction, self-esteem and depression, and executive functioning and eating, as well as mixed findings pertaining to theory of mind deficits, such as perspective taking and emotion recognition, and family functioning. Prospective empirical studies should incorporate these complexities and investigate underlying multiple psychological mediation mechanisms, preferably with experimental designs and longitudinal studies for further causal explanations.

Indexed as

AnorexiaBulimiaEating disordersEmotion regulationExecutive functionSelf-esteemTheory of mindTrans-diagnostic theory

Identifiers

PMID36406673
PMCPMC9667260
OpenAlexW4308926591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.