ArticleHeliyon2022
Pulmonary function and respiratory symptoms in workers exposed to respirable silica dust: A historical cohort study.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and risk factors for the development of COPD among workers in stone quarries: a cross-sectional study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Potential Effect of Combined Exposure of Crystalline Silica Dust and Cigarette Smoking on the Incidence of Silicosis among Chinese Male Stone Processing Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Analysis of influencing factors and a predictive model of small airway dysfunction in adults.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Assessment of Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The adverse health effects of silica are still a major concern in some industries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pulmonary function in a group of sub-radiological silicotic workers after 11 years of silica dust exposure. Methods: The study sample consisted of 381 exposed and 254 non-exposed workers. The history of pulmonary function parameters was obtained from workers' medical records. The data were collected through interviews with employees and completing questionnaires on demographic variables, detailed occupational and medical history, and respiratory symptoms. Workers' exposure to silica dust was also determined. Results: The mean frequency of workers' exposure to silica dust was 6.3 times greater than its exposure limit. All pulmonary function parameters were significantly lower in the silica-exposed workers, and the difference between the two groups was still statistically significant after adjusting the potential confounding variables. FEV1 showed the greatest reduction, and FVC and FEV1 showed a significant decreasing trend. Also the prevalence of respiratory symptoms was significantly higher in smokers than in nonsmokers among silica-exposed workers. Conclusions: Even in the absence of radiographic evidence of silicosis, exposure to high levels of silica dust is associated with reductions in pulmonary function. In the absence of radiological evidence of silicosis, progressive deterioration of FEV1 over time most likely indicates sub-radiological silicosis. The effects were associated with the severity and duration of exposure. Exposure to sub-TLV levels of silica dust may not affect pulmonary function. Smoking appears to have a synergistic effect in relatively high silica exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.