Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36406557›Full record

ReviewACS omega2022

Power from Geothermal Resources as a Co-product of the Oil and Gas Industry: A Review.

Natalia A Cano, Santiago Céspedes, José Redondo, Gordon Foo, David Jaramillo, Daniel Martinez, Manuel Gutiérrez, Javier Pataquiba, Juan Rojas, Farid B Cortés and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalia A CanoGrupo de Investigación en Fenómenos de Superficie-Michael Polanyi, Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín, Medellín 050034, Colombia.
Santiago CéspedesGrupo de Investigación en Fenómenos de Superficie-Michael Polanyi, Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín, Medellín 050034, Colombia.
José RedondoGrupo de Investigación en Fenómenos de Superficie-Michael Polanyi, Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín, Medellín 050034, Colombia.
Gordon FooParex Resources Colombia Ltd., Bogotá 110111, Colombia.
David JaramilloParex Resources Colombia Ltd., Bogotá 110111, Colombia.
Daniel MartinezParex Resources Colombia Ltd., Bogotá 110111, Colombia.
Manuel GutiérrezParex Resources Colombia Ltd., Bogotá 110111, Colombia.
Javier PataquibaParex Resources Colombia Ltd., Bogotá 110111, Colombia.
Juan RojasParex Resources Colombia Ltd., Bogotá 110111, Colombia.
Farid B CortésGrupo de Investigación en Fenómenos de Superficie-Michael Polanyi, Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín, Medellín 050034, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1207-3859
Camilo A FrancoGrupo de Investigación en Fenómenos de Superficie-Michael Polanyi, Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín, Medellín 050034, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-8338
Universidad Nacional de Colombia · COGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase in the global demand for energy and fossil fuel dependency is hindering efforts to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Geothermal resources supplement this increase in energy demand with reduced emissions because of their availability, base-load production profile, and climatic independence. Despite these advantages, the development of geothermal energy is limited because of different reasons such as subsurface exploration risk and high upfront capital cost for drilling and facility construction. However, similarities in infrastructure and operations between the oil and gas industry and the geothermal industry can optimize expense and development when exploiting geothermal resources. Thus, in this review, we present recent advances and applications of geothermal power systems in the oil and gas industry starting from the fundamentals and basic principles of geothermal energy and the organic Rankine cycle (ORC). These applications include the use of geothermal resources via abandoned wells, active wells, and paired thermal enhanced oil recovery processes with injection for fluid heating and energy production. Abandoned wells are alternatives that reduce costs in geothermal energy-use projects. The use of geothermal resources via active wells allows the valorization of a resource, such as the production of water, which is considered a byproduct of production activities in an oilfield. The use of thermally enhanced oil recovery processes enhances the energy conditions of fluids produced in the field, improving geothermal systems with fluids at higher temperatures. Finally, an overview is presented of the challenges and opportunities of geothermal energy in the oil industry where the requirement to improve the usage of technologies, such as the ORCs, with the working fluids used in the cycles, is highlighted. Furthermore, the importance of environmental studies and use of novel tools, such as nanotechnology, to improve the efficiency of geothermal energy usage is highlighted.

Identifiers

PMID36406557
PMCPMC9670100
OpenAlexW4307893844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.