Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36406457›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Assessment of shelf-life and metabolic viability of a multi-strain synbiotic using standard and innovative enumeration technologies.

Annalisa Visciglia, Serena Allesina, Angela Amoruso, Annachiara De Prisco, Raja Dhir, Peter A Bron, Marco Pane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Comparative Effects of Probiotics and Paraprobiotics Derived fromJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annalisa ViscigliaProbiotical Research S.r.l., Enrico Mattei, Novara, Italy.
Serena AllesinaProbiotical Research S.r.l., Enrico Mattei, Novara, Italy.
Angela AmorusoProbiotical Research S.r.l., Enrico Mattei, Novara, Italy.
Annachiara De PriscoProbiotical Research S.r.l., Enrico Mattei, Novara, Italy.
Raja DhirSeed Health, Abbot Kinney Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Peter A BronSeed Health, Abbot Kinney Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Marco PaneProbiotical Research S.r.l., Enrico Mattei, Novara, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of live bacterial cells is the most used parameter to assess the quality of finished probiotic products. Plate counting (PC) is the standard method in industry to enumerate cells. Application of PC implies critical aspects related to the selection of optimal nutrient media and growth conditions and underestimation of viable but not cultivable (VBNC) cells. Flow-cytometry (FC) is a culture-independent methodology having the potential to selectively enumerate live, damaged, and dead cells representing a powerful tool for in-depth monitoring of probiotic products. We monitored the shelf life of a clinical batch of a synbiotic composition PDS-08 targeting the pediatric population by means of PC and FC according to International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) pharma guidelines testing the Arrhenius model as predictive tool; PC enumeration revealed higher destruction rate than FC suggesting a faster reduction in cultivability than membrane integrity and thus a possible shift of the bacteria into a VBNC status. PDS-08 maintained acidification capability over time, when re-suspended in nutrient medium, even in samples tested sub-optimally for CFU detection (below 1 billion cells/dose). Due to similar kinetics described by the study of metabolic activity and membrane integrity, FC might be suggested as a valid tool for the study of functional stability of a probiotic product.

Indexed as

Arrhenius modelflow-cytometryfunctional stabilityplate countsprobioticVBNC

Identifiers

PMID36406457
PMCPMC9672074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.