ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Relationship between spinocranial angle and clinical outcomes after laminoplasty in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Radiological characteristics and associated factors of single-level cervical disc herniation combining with focal ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Can preoperative spino-cranial angle predict cervical sagittal imbalance after laminoplasty?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Long-term loss of intervertebral disc height after posterior cervical surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a retrospective study with more than 3 years of follow-up.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- New Personal Model for Forecasting the Outcome of Patients with Histological Grade III-IV Colorectal Cancer Based on Regional Lymph Nodes.Journal of oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aims of this study were to identify the relationship between the spinocranial angle (SCA) and clinical outcomes and to explore whether the SCA is a suitable indicator to predict clinical outcomes for patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods: Sixty-five patients with cervical OPLL who underwent laminoplasty with at least 24 months of follow-up were selected for the current study and were divided into two groups according to whether the SCA was greater than or less than the mean preoperative SCA. Sagittal alignment changes were compared between the groups. The Pearson correlation coefficient was applied to assess the relationship among sagittal parameters. Univariate and multiple linear regression analyses were applied to identify the relationship between the recovery rate (RR) and radiological parameters. Results: Patients were classified into two groups based on the mean value of preoperative SCA (85.1°). SCA was negatively correlated with T1 slope (T1s) and cervical lordosis (CL) and positively correlated with the C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) ( Conclusion: Patients with lower SCA tended to have higher T1s and CL before surgery and greater loss of cervical lordosis at the follow-up visit but still maintained a greater lordosis angle. Although preoperative SCA is significantly related to RR, the relationship is not sufficient to indicate that preoperative SCA can be used to predict clinical outcomes. Therefore, further research is needed to confirm the impact of SCA on clinical outcomes for OPLL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.