ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022
Drug discovery by a basic research scientist.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
I was fortunate to do my military service during the Vietnam era as a medical officer at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland. My first research at NIH was concerned with making a variety of optical measurements on nucleic acid bases and proteins, including single crystal spectra in linearly polarized light and near infrared circular dichroism, interpreting the spectra using molecular orbital and crystal field theories. What I do now is drug discovery, a field at the opposite end of the scientific spectrum. This article gives a brief account of my transition from spectroscopy to sickle cell hemoglobin polymerization to protein folding to drug discovery for treating sickle cell disease. My lab recently developed a high throughput assay to screen the 12,657 compounds of the California Institute of Biomedical Research ReFrame drug repurposing library. This is a precious library because the compounds have either been FDA approved or have been tested in clinical trials. Since the 1970s numerous agents have been reported in the literature to inhibit HbS polymerization and/or sickling with only one successful drug, hydroxyurea, and another of dubious value, voxelotor, even though it has been approved by the FDA. Our screen has discovered 106 anti-sickling agents in the ReFrame compound library. We estimate that as many as 21 of these compounds could become oral drugs for treating sickle cell disease because they inhibit at concentrations typical of the free concentrations of oral drugs in human serum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.