Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36406221›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Biomechanical evaluation of an allograft fixation system for ACL reconstruction.

Emir Benca, Kenneth P van Knegsel, Ivan Zderic, Jan Caspar, Andreas Strassl, Lena Hirtler, Christoph Fuchssteiner, Boyko Gueorguiev, Reinhard Windhager, Harald Widhalm and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emir BencaDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kenneth P van KnegselAO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland.
Ivan ZdericAO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland.
Jan CasparAO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland.
Andreas StrasslDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lena HirtlerDivision of Anatomy, Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph FuchssteinerDivision of Anatomy, Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Boyko GueorguievAO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland.
Reinhard WindhagerDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Harald WidhalmDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Peter VargaAO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability, especially graft slippage of an allograft screw and a conventional interference screw for tibial implant fixation in ACL reconstruction. Twenty-four paired human proximal tibia specimens underwent ACL reconstruction, with the graft in one specimen of each pair fixed using the allograft screw and the other using the conventional interference screw. Specimens were subjected to cyclic tensile loading until failure. The two fixation methods did not show any statistical difference in load at graft slippage (

Indexed as

ACLallograftbiomechanical studyfixationhuman specimensin vitro

Identifiers

PMID36406221
PMCPMC9670106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.