ArticleInternational journal of information security2023
A review on fake news detection 3T's: typology, time of detection, taxonomies.
Article in International journal of information security, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unmasking digital deceptions: An integrative review of deepfake detection, multimedia forensics, and cybersecurity challenges.MethodsX · 2025Review
- The relationship between information hoarding and selective exposure: the role of information overload, identity bubble reinforcement, and intolerance of uncertainty.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Ensemble based high performance deep learning models for fake news detection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fake news has become an industry on its own, where users paid to write fake news and create clickbait content to allure the audience. Apparently, the detection of fake news is a crucial problem and several studies have proposed machine-learning-based techniques to combat fake news. Existing surveys present the review of proposed solutions, while this survey presents several aspects that are required to be considered before designing an effective solution. To this aim, we provide a comprehensive overview of false news detection. The survey presents (1) a clarity to problem definition by explaining different types of false information (like fake news, rumor, clickbait, satire, and hoax) with real-life examples, (2) a list of actors involved in spreading false information, (3) actions taken by service providers, (4) a list of publicly available datasets for fake news in three different formats, i.e., texts, images, and videos, (5) a novel three-phase detection model based on the time of detection, (6) four different taxonomies to classify research based on new-fangled viewpoints in order to provide a succinct roadmap for future, and (7) key bibliometric indicators. In a nutshell, the survey focuses on three key aspects represented as the three T's: Typology of false information, Time of detection, and Taxonomies to classify research. Finally, by reviewing and summarizing several studies on fake news, we outline some potential research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.