Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36406021›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2022

Antibiotics Tubes and Lines.

Navpreet Khurana, Aliaksei Salei, Andrew J Gunn, Junjian Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Navpreet KhuranaDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Aliaksei SaleiDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Andrew J GunnDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Junjian HuangDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic prophylaxis in interventional radiology (IR) is widely used; however, such practice is based on data from the surgical literature. Although published guidelines can help determine the need for prophylactic antibiotic use in the patient undergoing percutaneous procedures, local practice patterns often dictate when such medications are given. In this article, the current state of periprocedural antibiotic use in commonly performed IR procedures (i.e., tube and catheter placements) is presented.

Indexed as

antibioticinfectioninterventional radiologyprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID36406021
PMCPMC9671683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.