Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36405920›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Revision and psychometric properties of the negative cognitive processing bias scale.

Kuan Miao, Xuerong Liu, Xiaoling Zhang, Yuanyuan Li, Xingya Liao, Rui Zhang, Zhengzhi Feng, Zhiyi Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kuan MiaoSchool of Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xuerong LiuSchool of Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaoling ZhangSchool of Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yuanyuan LiWestern Medical Branch of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xingya LiaoSchool of Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Rui ZhangSchool of Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhengzhi FengSchool of Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhiyi ChenSchool of Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Army Medical University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative cognitive processing bias (NCPB) is a cognitive trait that makes individuals more inclined to prioritize negative external stimuli (cues) when processing information. Cognitive biases have long been observed in mood and anxiety disorders, improving validation of tools to measure this phenomenon will aid us to determine whether there is a robust relationship between NCPB and major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders and other clinical disorders. Despite the development of an initial measure of this trait, that is, the negative cognitive processing bias questionnaire (NCPBQ), the lack of psychometric examinations and applications in large-scale samples hinders the determination of its reliability and validity and further limits our understanding of how to measure the NCPB traits of individuals accurately. To address these issues, the current study evaluated the psychometric properties of the NCPBQ in a large-scale sample (

Indexed as

depressionmeasurementmental healthnegative cognitive processing biaspsychometric propertiesscale revision

Identifiers

PMID36405920
PMCPMC9669056
OpenAlexW4308418591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.