Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36405727›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

The role of immune profile in predicting outcomes in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.

Andrea Botticelli, Giulia Pomati, Alessio Cirillo, Simone Scagnoli, Simona Pisegna, Antonella Chiavassa, Ernesto Rossi, Giovanni Schinzari, Giampaolo Tortora, Francesca Romana Di Pietro and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Andrea BotticelliDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giulia PomatiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alessio CirilloDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Simone ScagnoliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Simona PisegnaDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Antonella ChiavassaDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ernesto RossiMedical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCSS), Rome, Italy.
Giovanni SchinzariMedical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCSS), Rome, Italy.
Giampaolo TortoraMedical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCSS), Rome, Italy.
Francesca Romana Di PietroIstituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Rome, Italy.
Bruna CerbelliDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnology, Polo Pontino, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra Di FilippoLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Cell Therapy, Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Umberto I, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Sasan AmirhassankhaniDepartment of Urology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital University of Bologna, Via Palagi, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro ScalaMedical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCSS), Rome, Italy.
Ilaria Grazia ZizzariLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Cell Therapy, Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Umberto I, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Enrico CortesiDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Silverio TomaoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Marianna NutiLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Cell Therapy, Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Umberto I, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Silvia MeziDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Paolo MarchettiIstituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the efficacy of immunotherapy, only a small percentage of patients achieves a long-term benefit in terms of overall survival. The aim of this study was to define an immune profile predicting the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, who underwent ICI treatment were enrolled in this prospective study. Blood samples were collected at the baseline. Thirteen soluble immune checkpoints, 3 soluble adhesion molecules, 5 chemokines and 11 cytokines were analyzed. The results were associated with oncological outcomes. Results: Regardless of tumor type, patients with values of sTIM3, IFNα, IFNγ, IL1β, IL1α, IL12p70, MIP1β, IL13, sCD28, sGITR, sPDL1, IL10 and TNFα below the median had longer overall survival (p<0.05). By using cluster analysis and grouping the patients according to the trend of the molecules, two clusters were found. Cluster A had a significantly higher mean progression free survival (Cluster A=11.9 months vs Cluster B=3.5 months, p<0.01), a higher percentage of disease stability (Cluster A=34.5% vs. Cluster B=0%, p<0.05) and a lower percentage of disease progression (Cluster A=55.2% vs. Cluster B = 94.4%, p=0.04). Conclusion: The combined evaluation of soluble molecules, rather than a single circulating factor, may be more suitable to represent the fitness of the immune system status in each patient and could allow to identify two different prognostic and predictive outcome profiles.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyProspective StudiesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorschemokinescytokinesimmunotherapysoluble immune check-pointstumor biomarker

Identifiers

PMID36405727
PMCPMC9671166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.