Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36405678›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology in Europe2021

Reporting Cultural Adaptation in Psychological Trials - The RECAPT criteria.

Eva Heim, Ricarda Mewes, Jinane Abi Ramia, Heide Glaesmer, Brian Hall, Melissa Harper Shehadeh, Burçin Ünlü, Schahryar Kananian, Brandon A Kohrt, Franziska Lechner-Meichsner and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Global Is Local: Leveraging Global Mental-Health Methods to Promote Equity and Address Disparities in the United States.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Eva HeimInstitute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7434-7451
Ricarda MewesOutpatient Unit for Research, Teaching and Practice, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jinane Abi RamiaNational Mental Health Programme - Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon.
Heide GlaesmerDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Brian HallGlobal Public Health, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Melissa Harper ShehadehGlobal Public Health, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Burçin ÜnlüPsyQ, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Schahryar KananianDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Brandon A KohrtDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Franziska Lechner-MeichsnerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Annett LotzinDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Marie Rose MoroInserm, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris University, Paris, France.
Rahmeth RadjackInserm, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris University, Paris, France.
Alicia Salamanca-SanabriaFuture Health Technologies, Singapore-ETH Centre, Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE), Singapore, Singapore.
Daisy R SinglaCampbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Annabelle StarckDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Gesine SturmLaboratoire Cliniques Psychopathologique et Interculturelle LCPI EA 4591, Université Toulouse II - Jean Jaurès, Toulouse, France.
Wietse TolSection for Global Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cornelia WeiseDivision of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Christine KnaevelsrudDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Restoring mental health through community-based psychological services in New York City (RECOUP-NY)R01MH127767 · NIMH · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KOHRT, BRANDON ALAN · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
RESHAPE Diversity SupplementR01MH120649 · NIMH · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KOHRT, BRANDON ALAN · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120649NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH127767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of empirical evidence on the level of cultural adaptation required for psychological interventions developed in Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies to be effective for the treatment of common mental disorders among culturally and ethnically diverse groups. This lack of evidence is partly due to insufficient documentation of cultural adaptation in psychological trials. Standardised documentation is needed in order to enhance empirical and meta-analytic evidence. Process: A "Task force for cultural adaptation of mental health interventions for refugees" was established to harmonise and document the cultural adaptation process across several randomised controlled trials testing psychological interventions for mental health among refugee populations in Germany. Based on the collected experiences, a sub-group of the task force developed the reporting criteria presented in this paper. Thereafter, an online survey with international experts in cultural adaptation of psychological interventions was conducted, including two rounds of feedback. Results: The consolidation process resulted in eleven reporting criteria to guide and document the process of cultural adaptation of psychological interventions in clinical trials. A template for documenting this process is provided. The eleven criteria are structured along A) Set-up; B) Formative research methods; C) Intervention adaptation; D) Measuring outcomes and implementation. Conclusions: Reporting on cultural adaptation more consistently in future psychological trials will hopefully improve the quality of evidence and contribute to examining the effect of cultural adaptation on treatment efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability.

Indexed as

common mental disorderscultural adaptationpsychological interventionsrandomised controlled trialsreporting criteria

Identifiers

PMID36405678
PMCPMC9670826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.