Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36405676›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology in Europe2021

From Formative Research to Cultural Adaptation of a Face-to-Face and Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioural Intervention for Arabic-Speaking Refugees in Germany.

Maria Böttche, Christina Kampisiou, Nadine Stammel, Rayan El-Haj-Mohamad, Carina Heeke, Sebastian Burchert, Eva Heim, Birgit Wagner, Babette Renneberg, Johanna Böttcher and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria BöttcheClinical-Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christina KampisiouClinical-Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nadine StammelClinical-Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Rayan El-Haj-MohamadClinical-Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Carina HeekeClinical-Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian BurchertClinical-Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Eva HeimDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Birgit WagnerClinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Babette RennebergClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Johanna BöttcherClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Heide GlaesmerMedical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-MayfrankLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
Jürgen ZielasekLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
Alexander KonnopkaHealth Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Laura MurrayJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Christine KnaevelsrudClinical-Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DEHologic (Germany) · DELVR-Klinik Köln · DEJohns Hopkins University · USLeipzig University · DEMSB Medical School Berlin · DEPsychologische Hochschule Berlin · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aims to provide a transparent and replicable documentation approach for the cultural adaptation of a cognitive-behavioural transdiagnostic intervention (Common Elements Treatment Approach, CETA) for Arabic-speaking refugees with common mental disorders in Germany. Method: A mixed-methods approach was used, including literature review, interviews, expert decisions and questionnaires, in order to adapt the original CETA as well as an internet-based guided version (eCETA). The process of cultural adaptation was based on a conceptual framework and was facilitated by an adaptation monitoring form as well as guidelines which facilitate the reporting of cultural adaptation in psychological trials (RECAPT). Results: Consistent with this form and the guidelines, the decision-making process of adaptation proved to be coherent and stringent. All specific CETA treatment components seem to be suitable for the treatment of Arabic-speaking refugees in Germany. Adaptations were made to three different elements: 1) Cultural concepts of distress: a culturally appropriate explanatory model of symptoms was added; socially accepted terms for expressing symptoms (for eCETA only) and assessing suicidal ideation were adapted; 2) Treatment components: no adaptations for theoretically/empirically based components of the intervention, two adaptations for elements used by the therapist to engage the patient or implement the intervention (nonspecific elements), seven adaptations for skills implemented during sessions (therapeutic techniques; two for eCETA only) and 3) Treatment delivery: 21 surface adaptations (10 for eCETA only), two eCETA-only adaptations regarding the format. Conclusion: The conceptual framework and the RECAPT guidelines simplify, standardise and clarify the cultural adaptation process.

Indexed as

cultural adaptationdecision-making processrefugeestransdiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID36405676
PMCPMC9670828
OpenAlexW3216798702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.