ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Do statins benefit low-risk population for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of dietary supplementation with a new nutraceutical formulation on cardiometabolic risk factors: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical study.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reported beneficial effects of statins on cardiovascular outcome based on risk assessment are inconsistent. Therefore, we investigated statin therapy effectiveness for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), according to the Korean Risk Prediction Model (KRPM). Subjects aged 40-79 years with low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of < 190 mg/dL and without CVD history were categorized as statin users or non-users using the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) database, Korea, 2002-2015. The 10-year atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) risk was calculated using the validated KRPM and categorized as low, borderline, intermediate, or high-risk groups; the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) was compared over a mean follow-up period of 5.7 years using Cox proportional hazard models. The MACE incidence risk was decreased in statin users [hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.84-0.98)]. However, there was an increased risk of MACE incidence in low-risk statin users [HR 1.80, 95% CI (1.29-2.52)], and no significant relationship was identified between statin use and MACE in the borderline [HR 1.15, 95% CI (0.86-1.54)] and intermediate-risk [HR 0.94, 95% CI (0.85-1.03)] groups. The risk of MACE incidence decreased only in the high CVD risk group among statin users. Statin use is not associated with MACE reduction in low- to intermediate-risk participants. Therefore, individuals with LDL-C level of < 190 mg/dL and low ASCVD risk should consider statin therapy only when CVD risk is proved obvious using an appropriate ASCVD risk tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.