Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36405611›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Reappraisal of fibrosis-4 index and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score for advanced fibrosis in average-risk population.

Huiyul Park, Eileen L Yoon, Mimi Kim, Jonghyun Lee, Seon Cho, Dae Won Jun, Eun-Hee Nah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Suboptimal reliability of FIB-4 and NAFLD-fibrosis scores for staging of liver fibrosis in general population.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Huiyul ParkDepartment of Family Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Eileen L YoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Mimi KimDepartment of Radiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jonghyun LeeDepartment of Translational Medicine, Hanyang University Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Seoul, South Korea.
Seon ChoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Health Promotion Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Dae Won JunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun-Hee NahDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Health Promotion Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Hanyang University · KRKorea Health Promotion Institute · KRMyongji Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: The current cut-offs for fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS) are suboptimal for screening because of low accuracy and high false-negative rates in average-risk populations. This study aimed to reappraisal the performance of FIB-4 and NFS in such average-risk populations. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study, which retrospectively reviewed the magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) data of 8,522 subjects. Individuals with history of significant alcohol consumption and those with positive viral serologic markers were excluded. Finally, 6,215 average-risk individuals were analyzed. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of FIB-4 for the diagnosis of advanced hepatic fibrosis was higher than that in the NFS especially in the metabolically healthy. The AUROCs of FIB-4 for in the average-risk population was also higher than that in the NFS (0.840 in FIB-4 vs. 0.798, Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of FIB-4 was better than that of NFS for screening hepatic fibrosis in average-risk populations. It is recommended to use FIB-4 rather than NFS, when screening for hepatic fibrosis in general population.

Indexed as

advanced hepatic fibrosisaverage-risk populationfibrosis-4 indexmagnetic resonance elastographynon-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score

Identifiers

PMID36405611
PMCPMC9668872
OpenAlexW4308419874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.