ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Efficient-ECGNet framework for COVID-19 classification and correlation prediction with the cardio disease through electrocardiogram medical imaging.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-Enhanced ECG Applications in Cardiology: Comprehensive Insights from the Current Literature with a Focus on COVID-19 and Multiple Cardiovascular Conditions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Holistic Approach to Identify and Classify COVID-19 from Chest Radiographs, ECG, and CT-Scan Images Using ShuffleNet Convolutional Neural Network.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last 2 years, we have witnessed multiple waves of coronavirus that affected millions of people around the globe. The proper cure for COVID-19 has not been diagnosed as vaccinated people also got infected with this disease. Precise and timely detection of COVID-19 can save human lives and protect them from complicated treatment procedures. Researchers have employed several medical imaging modalities like CT-Scan and X-ray for COVID-19 detection, however, little concentration is invested in the ECG imaging analysis. ECGs are quickly available image modality in comparison to CT-Scan and X-ray, therefore, we use them for diagnosing COVID-19. Efficient and effective detection of COVID-19 from the ECG signal is a complex and time-taking task, as researchers usually convert them into numeric values before applying any method which ultimately increases the computational burden. In this work, we tried to overcome these challenges by directly employing the ECG images in a deep-learning (DL)-based approach. More specifically, we introduce an Efficient-ECGNet method that presents an improved version of the EfficientNetV2-B4 model with additional dense layers and is capable of accurately classifying the ECG images into healthy, COVID-19, myocardial infarction (MI), abnormal heartbeats (AHB), and patients with Previous History of Myocardial Infarction (PMI) classes. Moreover, we introduce a module to measure the similarity of COVID-19-affected ECG images with the rest of the diseases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first effort to approximate the correlation of COVID-19 patients with those having any previous or current history of cardio or respiratory disease. Further, we generate the heatmaps to demonstrate the accurate key-points computation ability of our method. We have performed extensive experimentation on a publicly available dataset to show the robustness of the proposed approach and confirmed that the Efficient-ECGNet framework is reliable to classify the ECG-based COVID-19 samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.