ArticleJournal of nutritional science2022
Comparison of dietary intake measured by a web-based FFQ and repeated 24-hour dietary recalls: the Hordaland Health Study.
Article in Journal of nutritional science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relative Validity of Food Frequency Questionnaires in Adult Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Gastrointestinal symptoms, faecal short-chain fatty acids and dietary intake in older adults: the Hordaland Health Study 3.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- The association between dietary total, animal and plant protein and macronutrient substitution; and the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular or cancer mortality in the Golestan cohort study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The (ab)use of food frequency questionnaire data in substitution modelling in nutritional epidemiology: a critique.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Review
- Design and Reproducibility of Food Propensity Questionnaire for Characterizing Intake of Pyrethroid and Organophosphate Insecticides in Adolescents.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The development and validation of a digital food-frequency questionnaire to assess habitual diet: The PREDICT Food Frequency Questionnaire.Journal of nutritional science · 2026Article
- Utility and applicability of a novel online dietary balance survey system: comparison with weighed dietary records.Journal of nutritional science · 2025Article
- Validity and reproducibility of a web-based dietary assessment tool: a cross-sectional study in an adult Danish population.Journal of nutritional science · 2025Article
- The Effect of Maternal Diet on Neonatal Jaundice: A Case-Control Study.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2025Article
- Validation of a digital food frequency questionnaire for the Northern Sweden Diet Database.Nutrition journal · 2024Article
- The Association of Isocaloric Substitution of Dietary Protein in Middle Age with Muscle Mass and Strength in Old Age: The Hordaland Health Study.Current developments in nutrition · 2024Article
- The association of dietary patterns with muscle mass and strength in old age: The Hordaland Health Study.European journal of nutrition · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
All dietary assessment methods inevitably introduce measurement errors, which should ideally be considered during data analysis and interpretation. Methodological studies should be conducted to address how well a given assessment method captures dietary intake and to highlight the extent and direction of the measurement error. Within a subgroup of the Hordaland Health Study (HUSK3), we examined the relative validity of a web-based food frequency questionnaire (WebFFQ) by comparing its estimates of mean daily intake of nutrients and foods with estimated mean daily intakes from repeated administrations of 24-hour dietary recall interviews (24-HDRs). Men and women born between 1950 and 1951 were recruited from HUSK3. The participants (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.