Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36404995›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Rheumatology2022

Integrated analysis of dermal blister fluid proteomics and genome-wide skin gene expression in systemic sclerosis: an observational study.

Kristina E N Clark, Eszter Csomor, Corrado Campochiaro, Nicholas Galwey, Katherine Nevin, Mary A Morse, Yee Voan Teo, Johannes Freudenberg, Voon H Ong, Emma Derrett-Smith and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification of driving genes of familial adenomatous polyposis by differential gene expression analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Biomarkers in Systemic Sclerosis: An Overview.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristina E N ClarkCentre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.
Eszter CsomorImmunoinflammation, GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
Corrado CampochiaroCentre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.
Nicholas GalweyImmunoinflammation, GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
Katherine NevinImmunoinflammation, GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
Mary A MorseImmunoinflammation, GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
Yee Voan TeoComputational Biology, GlaxoSmithKline, California, USA.
Johannes FreudenbergComputational Biology, GlaxoSmithKline, California, USA.
Voon H OngCentre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.
Emma Derrett-SmithCentre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.
Nicolas WisniackiImmunoinflammation, GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
Shaun M FlintImmunoinflammation, GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
Christopher P DentonCentre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T001631/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Skin fibrosis is a hallmark feature of systemic sclerosis. Skin biopsy transcriptomics and blister fluid proteomics give insight into the local environment of the skin. We have integrated these modalities with the aim of developing a surrogate for the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), using candidate genes and proteins from the skin and blister fluid as anchors to identify key analytes in the plasma. Methods: In this single-centre, prospective observational study at the Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK, transcriptional and proteomic analyses of blood and skin were performed in a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis (n=52) and healthy controls (n=16). Weighted gene co-expression network analysis was used to explore the association of skin transcriptomics data, clinical traits, and blister fluid proteomic results. Candidate hub analytes were identified as those present in both blister and skin gene sets (modules), and which correlated with plasma (module membership >0·7 and gene significance >0·6). Hub analytes were confirmed using RNA transcript data obtained from skin biopsy samples from patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis at 12 months. Findings: We identified three modules in the skin, and two in blister fluid, which correlated with a diagnosis of early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. From these modules, 11 key hub analytes were identified, present in both skin and blister fluid modules, whose transcript and protein levels correlated with plasma protein concentrations, mRSS, and showed statistically significant correlation on repeat transcriptomic samples taken at 12 months. Multivariate analysis identified four plasma analytes as correlates of mRSS (COL4A1, COMP, SPON1, and TNC), which can be used to differentiate disease subtype. Interpretation: This unbiased approach has identified potential biological candidates that might be drivers of local skin pathogenesis in systemic sclerosis. By focusing on measurable analytes in the plasma, we generated a promising composite plasma protein biomarker that could be used for assessment of skin severity, case stratification, and as a potential outcome measure for clinical trials and practice. Once fully validated, the biomarker score could replace a clinical score such as the mRSS, which carries substantial variability. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline and UK Medical Research Council.

Identifiers

PMID36404995
PMCPMC9669928
OpenAlexW4283384763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.