Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36404920›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Aversive Bimodal Associations Differently Impact Visual and Olfactory Memory Performance in

Devasena Thiagarajan, Franziska Eberl, Daniel Veit, Bill S Hansson, Markus Knaden, Silke Sachse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Classical Conditioning of AdultCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2025
    Article
  2. Twists to Classical Conditioning of AdultCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Devasena ThiagarajanResearch Group Olfactory Coding, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Franziska EberlMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Daniel VeitMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Bill S HanssonDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Markus KnadenDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Silke SachseResearch Group Olfactory Coding, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals form sensory associations and store them as memories to guide behavioral decisions. Although unimodal learning has been studied extensively in insects, it is important to explore sensory cues in combination because most behaviors require multimodal inputs. In our study, we optimized the T-maze to employ both visual and olfactory cues in a classical aversive learning paradigm in

Indexed as

behavioral neurosciencesensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID36404920
PMCPMC9672954
OpenAlexW4308489458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.