ArticleInternational journal of bioprinting2022
In vitro Evaluation of a 20% Bioglass-Containing 3D printable PLA Composite for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Article in International journal of bioprinting, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Surgical Trauma-Activated Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Mesenchymal Stromal Cells In Vitro.Cells · 2026Article
- Granulate-to-Filament: An Extrusion-Mixed PLA-Human Bone Material System for 3D-Printed Bone Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Review
- Biocompatible Thermoplastics in Additive Manufacturing of Bone Defect Fillers: State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- A new 3D-printed polylactic acid-bioglass composite for bone tissue engineering induces angiogenesisInternational journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- 369Fabrication of 3D gel-printed β-tricalcium phosphate/titanium dioxide porous scaffolds for cancellous bone tissue engineering.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is considered a key technology in the production of customized scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. In a previous work, we developed a 3D printable, osteoconductive, hierarchical organized scaffold system. The scaffold material should be osteoinductive. Polylactic acid (PLA) (polymer)/Bioglass (BG) (mineral/ion source) composite materials are promising. Previous studies of PLA/BG composites never exceed BG fractions of 10%, as increase of bioactive BG component negatively affects the printability of the composite material. Here, we test a novel, 3D printable PLA/BG composite with BG fractions up to 20% for its biological activity
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.