ReviewInternational journal of bioprinting2022
A Review on Bioinks and their Application in Plant Bioprinting.
Review in International journal of bioprinting, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Nature to Innovation: Exploring Natural Biopolymers in 3D Bioprinting for Bone Regeneration.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Processes, and Emerging Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Microgel-based bioink for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting and its applications in tissue engineering.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Custom Microalgae-Based Bioink Formulations for Optimized Green Bioprinting.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Microalgae-based bioremediation of refractory pollutants: an approach towards environmental sustainability.Microbial cell factories · 2025Review
- Development, Optimization, and Clinical Relevance of Lactoferrin Delivery Systems: A Focus on Ocular Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Plant-Based Decellularization: A Novel Approach for Perfusion-Compatible Tissue Engineering Structures.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Applications of 3D Bioprinting Technology to Brain Cells and Brain Tumor Models: Special Emphasis to Glioblastoma.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Review
- Building Synthetic Cells─From the Technology Infrastructure to Cellular Entities.ACS synthetic biology · 2024Review
- Advancements in tissue engineering for cardiovascular health: a biomedical engineering perspective.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Empowering Precision Medicine: The Impact of 3D Printing on Personalized Therapeutic.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2023Review
- Biomedical Applications of Lactoferrin on the Ocular Surface.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the characterization and fabrication methods concerning new bioinks have received much attention, largely because the absence of bioprintable materials has been identified as one of the most rudimentary challenges for rapid advancement in the field of three-dimensional (3D) printing. Bioinks for printing mammalian organs have been rapidly produced, but bioinks in the field of plant science remain sparse. Thus, 3D fabrication of plant parts is still in its infancy due to the lack of appropriate bioink materials, and aside from that, the difficulty in recreating sophisticated microarchitectures that accurately and safely mimic natural biological activities is a concern. Therefore, this review article is designed to emphasize the significance of bioinks and their applications in plant bioprinting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.