Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36404782›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of bioprinting2022

Fused Deposition Modeling PEEK Implants for Personalized Surgical Application: From Clinical Need to Biofabrication.

Lei Wang, Chuncheng Yang, Changning Sun, Xiaolong Yan, Jiankang He, Changquan Shi, Chaozong Liu, Dichen Li, Tao Jiang, Lijun Huang

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of bioprinting, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lei WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Chuncheng YangState Key Laboratory for Manufacturing System Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710054, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Changning SunState Key Laboratory for Manufacturing System Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710054, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Xiaolong YanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Jiankang HeState Key Laboratory for Manufacturing System Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710054, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Changquan ShiState Key Laboratory for Manufacturing System Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710054, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Chaozong LiuInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, UK.
Dichen LiState Key Laboratory for Manufacturing System Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710054, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Tao JiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Lijun HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Tang Du Hospital · CNNational Medical Products Administration · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CNRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology is suitable for manufacturing personalized orthopedic implants for reconstruction surgery. Compared with traditional titanium, polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) is the ideal material for 3DP orthopedic implants due to its various advantages, including thermoplasticity, thermal stability, high chemical stability, and radiolucency suitable elastic modulus. However, it is challenging to develop a well-designed method and manufacturing technique to meet the clinical needs because it requires elaborate details and interplays with clinical work. Furthermore, establishing surgical standards for new implants requires many clinical cases and an accumulation of surgical experience. Thus, there are few case reports on using 3DP PEEK implants in clinical practice. Herein, we formed a team with a lot of engineers, scientists, and doctors and conducted a series of studies on the 3DP PEEK implants for chest wall reconstruction. First, the thoracic surgeons sort out the specific types of chest wall defects. Then, the engineers designed the shape of the implant and performed finite element analysis for every implant. To meet the clinical needs and mechanical requirements of implants, we developed a new fused deposition modeling technology to make personalized PEEK implants. Overall, the thoracic surgeons have used 114 personalized 3DP PEEK implants to reconstruct the chest wall defect and further established the surgical standards of the implants as part of the Chinese clinical guidelines. The surface modification technique and composite process are developed to overcome the new clinical problems of implant-related complications after surgery. Finally, the major challenges and possible solutions to translating 3DP PEEK implants into a mature and prevalent clinical product are discussed in the paper.

Indexed as

Chest wall reconstructionFused deposition modelingPolyether-ether-ketoneThree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID36404782
PMCPMC9668577
OpenAlexW4295941474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.