Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36404714›Full record

ReviewDigestion2023

Positioning and Usefulness of Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Toshiyuki Sakurai, Masayuki Saruta

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestion, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
22.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Targeting the non-coding RNA-PANoptosis axis: a novel frontier in disease diagnosis and therapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Recent advances in the management of small bowel Crohn's disease.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toshiyuki SakuraiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, to-sakurai@jikei.ac.jp.
Masayuki SarutaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Jikei University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMucosal healing (MH) was proposed to be an ideal treatment goal for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Instead of endoscopy to confirm MH, biomarkers are frequently used and have become an indispensable modality for the clinical examination of patients with IBD. SUMMARY: Common biomarkers of IBD include C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies, leucine-rich α2 glycoprotein, fecal calprotectin (FCP), and the fecal immunochemical test. Biomarkers play five major roles in the management of IBD: (1) diagnosing and distinguishing between IBD and non-IBD or ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease; (2) predicting treatment response, especially before administrating biologics; (3) monitoring and grasping endoscopic or histological disease activity; (4) replacing endoscopy for diagnosing MH, including endoscopic and histological remission; and (5) predicting recurrence before disease activity appears through symptoms. Many reports have demonstrated the usefulness of CRP and FCP for those five roles; however, they have limitations for diagnosing MH or predicting treatment response. In general, FCP has better ability in those positions than CRP; additionally, leucine-rich α2 glycoprotein can diagnose endoscopic disease activity better than CRP. The novel biomarker, prostaglandin E-major urinary metabolite, and anti-αvβ6 antibody are expected to be noninvasive and reliable biomarkers; however, more evidence is required for future studies. Oncostatin M and microRNA are also prospects, in addition to other familiar and novel biomarkers. KEY MESSAGES: Each biomarker has a useful feature; therefore, we should consider their features and use appropriate biomarkers for the five roles to enable noninvasive and smooth management of IBD.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeInflammatory Bowel DiseasesBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinFecesGlycoproteinsHumansLeucineLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexSeverity of Illness IndexBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinGlycoproteinsLeucineLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexBiomarkerCrohn’s diseaseUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID36404714
PMCPMC9843547
OpenAlexW4309466247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.