Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36404613›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2023

Central command suppresses pressor-evoked bradycardia at the onset of voluntary standing up in conscious cats.

Kei Ishii, Mitsuhiro Idesako, Ryota Asahara, Nan Liang, Kanji Matsukawa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kei IshiiHuman Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9423-2923
Mitsuhiro IdesakoDepartment of Integrative Physiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ryota AsaharaHuman Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0861-0861
Nan LiangDepartment of Integrative Physiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kanji MatsukawaDepartment of Integrative Physiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4768-3473
Hiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NEW

findingsWhat is the central question of this study? Standing up can cause hypotension and tachycardia. Accumulated evidence poses the simple question, does the cardiac baroreflex operate at the onset of standing up? If the cardiac baroreflex is suppressed, what mechanism is responsible for baroreflex inhibition? What is the main finding and its importance? In cats, we found blunting of cardiac baroreflex sensitivity in the pressor range at the onset of voluntary hindlimb standing, but not of passive hindlimb standing. This finding suggests that central command suppresses pressor-evoked bradycardia at the onset of standing up, probably in advance, to prevent or buffer orthostatic hypotension. ABSTRACT: It remains unclear whether cardiac baroreflex function is preserved or suppressed at the onset of standing up. To answer the question and, if cardiac baroreflex is suppressed, to investigate the mechanism responsible for the suppression, we compared the sensitivity of the arterial cardiac baroreflex at the onset of voluntary and passive hindlimb standing in conscious cats. Cardiac baroreflex sensitivity was estimated from the maximal slope of the baroreflex curve between the responses of systolic arterial blood pressure and heart rate to a brief occlusion of the abdominal aorta. The systolic arterial blood pressure response to standing up without aortic occlusion was greater in the voluntary case than in the passive case. Cardiac baroreflex sensitivity was clearly decreased at the onset of voluntary standing up compared with rest (P = 0.005) and the onset of passive standing up (P = 0.007). The cardiac baroreflex sensitivity at the onset of passive standing up was similar to that at rest (P = 0.909). The findings suggest that central command would transmit a modulatory signal to the cardiac baroreflex system during the voluntary initiation of standing up. Furthermore, the present data tempt speculation on a close relationship between central inhibition of the cardiac baroreflex and the centrally induced tachycardiac response to standing up.

Indexed as

BaroreflexBradycardiaAnimalsBlood PressureCatsHeart Ratebaroreflex slopecentral commandvoluntary standing up

Identifiers

PMID36404613
PMCPMC10103771
OpenAlexW4309510371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.