ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022
Long-Term Effect of Pancreaticoduodenectomy Combined with Revascularization for Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma in Elderly Patients.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with revascularization (PDR) is the main surgical procedure for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with venous system invasion, but this procedure is discouraged in elderly patients because of physical complexity. Our aim was to explore the differences of perioperative and survival in patients of different ages who underwent PDR. MATERIAL AND METHODS We reviewed data from PDAC patients undergoing PDR from 2007 to 2018. Patients were subdivided into 3 groups according to age: <60 years, 60-70 years, and ≥70 years. Postoperative complications and long-term survival were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS From 626 patients, 185 had en bloc venous resection who underwent PDR (103, 55, and 27 patients from young to elderly). Increasing age was linked to a higher prevalence of ICU management (P=0.035) and more serious complications (grade ≥III, P=0.043); overall mortality was 8.1% and did not significantly differ among age-matched groups. Further, there was no difference in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) based on age (<60, 60-70, ≥70, median OS were 9.7, 8.4 vs 9.1 months, respectively, P=0.787; median PFS were 6.9, 6.1 vs 8.4 months, respectively, P=0.603). However, patients <60 years whose tumors invaded the superior mesenteric vascular had better survival outcomes when compared with the other 2 groups (11.5 vs 8.4, 9.1 months, P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS The results show that age should not be considered an absolute contraindication for PDR, as elderly patients can achieve the same surgical efficacy and long-term survival prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.