ArticleDysphagia2023
Effect of Modified Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation on Patients with Severe Chronic Neurogenic Dysphagia: A Single-Arm Prospective Study.
Article in Dysphagia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuromuscular-related interventions for post-stroke dysphagia: a comprehensive narrative review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of four non-invasive stimulations on swallowing function and quality of life of stroke patients-a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Sensory Afferent Neural Circuits Mediate Electroacupuncture to Improve Swallowing Function in a Post-Stroke Dysphagia Mouse Model.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Clinical study on the efficacy of postural control combined with electroacupuncture in treating dysphagia after stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Neuroplasticity Elicited by Modified Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation: A Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Current treatments for severe chronic neurogenic dysphagia (SCND) are limited. Modified pharyngeal electrical stimulation (mPES) was modified from pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES). This prospective study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of mPES on SCND. 30 patients with severe chronic neurogenic dysphagia were recruited. mPES was administered to patients once daily until the functional oral intake scale score (FOIS) reach 3. Videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS), flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), and high-resolution manometry (HRM) were utilized for evaluating the swallowing function. After mPES, 24 of 30 patients (80%) reached the endpoint (FOIS = 3) (P < 0.001). 3 of 6 tracheotomized patients (50%) removed the tracheal tube. The median number of mPES sessions for the 24 patients who met the criteria was 28 (17, 38) and the median period was 43 (29, 63) days. Moreover, a significant increase was observed in hypopharyngeal peak pressure (P = 0.015), hypopharyngeal contraction duration (P = 0.023), velopharyngeal peak pressure (P = 0.044), and velopharyngeal contraction duration (P = 0.031). A reduction was observed in PAS (P < 0.001), secretion (P = 0.001), vallecular residue (P < 0.001), left (P = 0.001), and right (P < 0.001) pyriform sinus residue. The median FOIS of 30 patients at 3-month follow-up was 5 (3, 6). No serious side effects were reported. mPES is a promising effective and safe therapeutic approach that is simple to use in patients with SCND.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.