Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36404335›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2022

Utilization and impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance on patient management in heart failure: insights from the SCMR Registry.

Idan Roifman, Michael Hammer, John Sparkes, Erica Dall'Armellina, Raymond Y Kwong, Graham Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Registry at 150,000.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Idan RoifmanSchulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, On, Canada. idan.roifman@sunnybrook.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4058-4085
Michael HammerSchulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, On, Canada.
John SparkesSchulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, On, Canada.
Erica Dall'ArmellinaUniversity of Leeds, England, UK.
Raymond Y KwongCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Graham WrightSchulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, On, Canada.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/13/71/30378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an important diagnostic test used in the evaluation of patients with heart failure (HF). However, the demographics and clinical characteristics of those undergoing CMR for evaluation of HF are unknown. Further, the impact of CMR on subsequent HF patient care is unclear. The goal of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients undergoing CMR for HF and to determine the extent to which CMR leads to changes in downstream patient management by comparing pre-CMR indications and post-CMR diagnoses.

methodsWe utilized the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Registry as our data source and abstracted data for patients undergoing CMR scanning for HF indications from 2013 to 2019. Descriptive statistics (percentages, proportions) were performed on key CMR and clinical variables of the patient population. The Fisher's exact test was used when comparing categorical variables. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare continuous variables.

results3,837 patients were included in our study. 94% of the CMRs were performed in the United States with China, South Korea and India also contributing cases. Median age of HF patients was 59.3 years (IQR, 47.1, 68.3 years) with 67% of the scans occurring on women. Almost 2/3 of the patients were scanned on 3T CMR scanners. Overall, 49% of patients who underwent CMR scanning for HF had a change between the pre-test indication and post CMR diagnosis. 53% of patients undergoing scanning on 3T had a change between the pre-test indication and post CMR diagnosis when compared to 44% of patients who were scanned on 1.5T (p < 0.01).

conclusionOur results suggest a potential impact of CMR scanning on downstream diagnosis of patients referred for CMR for HF, with a larger potential impact on those scanned on 3T CMR scanners.

Indexed as

Heart FailureFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesHeart failureImpact of CMRReal WorldRegistry

Identifiers

PMID36404335
PMCPMC9677679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.