Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36404327›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2022

Biomarkers for isolated congenital heart disease based on maternal amniotic fluid metabolomics analysis.

Xuelian Yuan, Lu Li, Hong Kang, Meixian Wang, Jing Zeng, Yanfang Lei, Nana Li, Ping Yu, Xiaohong Li, Zhen Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xuelian Yuan *National Center for Birth Defect Monitoring, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Lu Li *National Center for Birth Defect Monitoring, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hong KangNational Center for Birth Defect Monitoring, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Meixian WangNational Center for Birth Defect Monitoring, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jing ZengDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Longchang Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Neijiang, Sichuan, China.
Yanfang LeiDepartment of Obstetrics, Zhaotong Second People's Hospital, Zhaotong, Yunnan, China.
Nana LiNational Center for Birth Defect Monitoring, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ping YuNational Center for Birth Defect Monitoring, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaohong LiNational Center for Birth Defect Monitoring, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. lixiaohong82@scu.edu.cn.
Zhen LiuNational Center for Birth Defect Monitoring, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Jenny_liu@scu.edu.cn.
West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CNMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Sichuan Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCongenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the most prevalent birth defects in the world. The pathogenesis of CHD is complex and unclear. With the development of metabolomics technology, variations in metabolites may provide new clues about the causes of CHD and may serve as a biomarker during pregnancy.

methodsSixty-five amniotic fluid samples (28 cases and 37 controls) during the second and third trimesters were utilized in this study. The metabolomics of CHD and normal fetuses were analyzed by untargeted metabolomics technology. Differential comparison and randomForest were used to screen metabolic biomarkers.

resultsA total of 2472 metabolites were detected, and they were distributed differentially between the cases and controls. Setting the selection criteria of fold change (FC) ≥ 2, P value < 0.01 and variable importance for the projection (VIP) ≥ 1.5, we screened 118 differential metabolites. Within the prediction model by random forest, PE(MonoMe(11,5)/MonoMe(13,5)), N-feruloylserotonin and 2,6-di-tert-butylbenzoquinone showed good prediction effects. Differential metabolites were mainly concentrated in aldosterone synthesis and secretion, drug metabolism, nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism pathways, which may be related to the occurrence and development of CHD.

conclusionThis study provides a new database of CHD metabolic biomarkers and mechanistic research. These results need to be further verified in larger samples.

Indexed as

Amniotic FluidHeart Defects, CongenitalBiomarkersFemaleHumansMetabolomicsPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdBiomarkersBiomarkerCongenital heart diseaseDiagnosisMetabolomicsReproduction

Identifiers

PMID36404327
PMCPMC9677635
OpenAlexW4309433279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.