ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Knowledge regarding breast cancer among Congolese women in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Knowledge of risk factors and early detection methods toward breast cancer among healthcare workers in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Knowledge regarding breast cancer among Congolese women in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBreast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer in women and is characterized by late clinical signs in developing countries, including the Democratic Republic of the Congo. One of the main reasons of death from breast cancer is lack of awareness and screening, which has led to late diagnosis (at an advanced stage). This study aims to measure women's knowledge regarding breast cancer in Kinshasa, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study of 489 women aged 20-65 years was conducted. Data was collected using a predesigned, tested, self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire included specific sections to test the participants' knowledge related to breast cancer and its screening, and practices related to breast self-examination (BSE). Bivariate and multivariate analyzes were used.
resultsOur results indicated that 22.09% of the participants had good breast cancer knowledge and 77.91% had poor breast cancer knowledge. Overall, 322 (65.85%) participants recognized that BSE is a valuable method for early screening of BSE. In total, 136 (27.81%) respondents had learned to do the BSE and 216 (44.17%) had reported doing it. Two hundred and ninety-two (59.71%) respondents mentioned that any woman was at risk for breast cancer and 357 (71.78%) mentioned that it was possible to prevent breast cancer. Determinants of an adequate level of knowledge were higher/university educational level (adjusted odds ratio = 2.70; 95% confidence interval: 1.27-5.73; p = .010) and having previously been screened for breast cancer (adjusted odds ratio = 2.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.40-3.83; p = .001).
conclusionThe majority (77.91%) of women have demonstrated poor knowledge of signs/symptoms, risk factors, and screening methods of breast cancer. Additional efforts should be made through women's healthcare workers to raise knowledge of breast cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.