Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36403819›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2023

Open-label phase I/II clinical trial of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (FINLAY-FR-2) in combination with receptor binding domain-protein vaccine (FINLAY-FR-1A) in children.

Rinaldo Puga-Gómez, Yariset Ricardo-Delgado, Chaumey Rojas-Iriarte, Leyanis Céspedes-Henriquez, Misleidys Piedra-Bello, Dania Vega-Mendoza, Noelvia Pestana Pérez, Beatriz Paredes-Moreno, Meiby Rodríguez-González, Carmen Valenzuela-Silva and 26 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Rinaldo Puga-GómezPediatric Hospital "Juan Manuel Marquez," Havana, Cuba; Central Clinic "Cira García", La Habana, Cuba.
Yariset Ricardo-DelgadoPediatric Hospital "Juan Manuel Marquez," Havana, Cuba.
Chaumey Rojas-IriartePoliclinic "5 de Septiembre", La Habana, Cuba.
Leyanis Céspedes-HenriquezPoliclinic "Carlos J. Finlay", La Habana, Cuba.
Misleidys Piedra-BelloPediatric Hospital "Juan Manuel Marquez," Havana, Cuba.
Dania Vega-MendozaPediatric Hospital "Juan Manuel Marquez," Havana, Cuba.
Noelvia Pestana PérezPediatric Hospital "Juan Manuel Marquez," Havana, Cuba.
Beatriz Paredes-MorenoFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Meiby Rodríguez-GonzálezFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Carmen Valenzuela-SilvaCybernetics, Mathematics, and Physics Institute, La Habana, Cuba.
Belinda Sánchez-RamírezCentre of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba.
Laura Rodríguez-NodaFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Rocmira Pérez-NicadoFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Raul González-MugicaFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Tays Hernández-GarcíaCentre of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba.
Talía Fundora-BarriosCentre of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba.
Martha Dubet EchevarríaNational Civil Defense Research Laboratory, Mayabeque, Cuba.
Juliet María Enriquez-PuertasNational Civil Defense Research Laboratory, Mayabeque, Cuba.
Yenicet Infante-HernándezNational Civil Defense Research Laboratory, Mayabeque, Cuba.
Ariel Palenzuela-DíazCentre for Immunoassays, La Habana, Cuba.
Evelyn Gato-OrozcoCentre for Immunoassays, La Habana, Cuba.
Yanet Chappi-EstévezNational Clinical Trials Coordinating Center, Havana, Cuba.
Julio Cesar Francisco-PérezPediatric Hospital "Borrás-Marfán", La Habana, Cuba.
Miladi Suarez-MartinezPoliclinic "Carlos J. Finlay", La Habana, Cuba.
Ismavy C Castillo-QuintanaFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Sonsire Fernandez-CastilloFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Yanet Climent-RuizFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Darielys Santana-MederosFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Yanelda García-VegaCentre of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba.
María Eugenia Toledo-Romani"Pedro Kourí" Tropical Medicine Institute, Habana, Cuba.
Delaram DoroudPasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Alireza BiglariPasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Yury Valdés-BalbínFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Dagmar García-RiveraFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba. Electronic address: dagarcia@finlay.edu.cu.
Vicente Vérez-BencomoFinlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba.
SOBERANA Research Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate a heterologous vaccination scheme in children 3-18 years old (y/o) combining two SARS-CoV-2r- receptor binding domain (RBD)protein vaccines.

methodsA phase I/II open-label, adaptive, and multicenter trial evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of two doses of FINLAY-FR-2 (subsequently called SOBERANA 02) and the third heterologous dose of FINLAY-FR-1A (subsequently called SOBERANA Plus) in 350 children 3-18 y/o in Havana Cuba. Primary outcomes were safety (phase I) and safety/immunogenicity (phase II) measured by anti-RBD immunoglobulin (Ig)G enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA), molecular and live-virus neutralization titers, and specific T-cells response. A comparison with adult immunogenicity and predictions of efficacy were made based on immunological results.

resultsLocal pain was the unique adverse event with frequency >10%, and none was serious neither severe. Two doses of FINLAY-FR-2 elicited a humoral immune response similar to natural infection; the third dose with FINLAY-FR-1A increased the response in all children, similar to that achieved in vaccinated young adults. The geometric mean (GMT) neutralizing titer was 173.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 131.7; 229.5) vs Alpha, 142 (95% CI 101.3; 198.9) vs Delta, 24.8 (95% CI 16.8; 36.6) vs Beta and 99.2 (95% CI 67.8; 145.4) vs Omicron.

conclusionThe heterologous scheme was safe and immunogenic in children 3-18 y/o. TRIAL REGISTRY: https://rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000374.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCarrier ProteinsChildChild, PreschoolHumansSARS-CoV-2Tetanus ToxoidVaccines, ConjugateYoung AdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCarrier ProteinsCOVID-19 VaccinesTetanus ToxoidVaccines, ConjugateConjugate vaccineCOVID-19Heterologous schemePediatric vaccineRBD vaccineSARS-CoV-2Subunit vaccine

Identifiers

PMID36403819
PMCPMC9673084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.