Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36403600›Full record

SynthesisThe lancet. Psychiatry2022

Sensitive periods in development and risk for psychiatric disorders and related endpoints: a systematic review of child maltreatment findings.

Jonathan D Schaefer, Theresa W Cheng, Erin C Dunn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Critical windows: timing of child maltreatment exposure and adult mental health.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan D SchaeferDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: schae567@umn.edu.
Theresa W ChengPsychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Erin C DunnPsychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

Childhood adversity, DNA methylation, and risk for depression: A longitudinal study of sensitive periods in developmentR01MH113930 · NIMH · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Erin Cathleen Dunn · 2017 to 2026
$6.6M
Training in genetic and neurobehavioral mechanisms of addictionT32DA050560 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Monica Luciana, Scott Ian Vrieze · 2020 to 2026
$2.0M
Genes, early adversity, and sensitive periods in social-emotional developmentK01MH102403 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DUNN, ERIN CATHLEEN · 2014 to 2017
$710k
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA050560NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH102403NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in the mental health of people who have experienced childhood maltreatment is substantial. One hypothesis is that this variation is attributable, in part, to the timing of maltreatment-specifically, whether maltreatment occurs during sensitive periods in development when the brain is maximally sensitive to particular types of environmental input. To determine whether there is scientific consensus around when periods of peak sensitivity occur, we did a systematic review of human observational studies. Although 89 (75%) of the 118 unique cross-sectional or longitudinal cohort studies we identified reported timing effects, no consistent sensitive periods were identified for any of the most studied outcomes. Thus, observational research on childhood maltreatment has yet to converge on a single period (or set of periods) of increased vulnerability. We identified study characteristics that might contribute to these between-study differences and used observations from our Review to suggest a comprehensive set of recommendations for future research.

Indexed as

Adult Survivors of Child AbuseChild AbuseMental DisordersChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal Studies

Identifiers

PMID36403600
PMCPMC10443538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.