Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36403291›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2023

Development and validation of questionnaires for eating-related distress among advanced cancer patients and families.

Koji Amano, Tatsuya Morita, Tomofumi Miura, Naoharu Mori, Ryohei Tatara, Takaomi Kessoku, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Keita Tagami, Hiroyuki Otani, Masanori Mori and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex-related differences in eating-related distress experienced by patients with advanced cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Associations of nutrition impact symptoms with depression in patients with advanced cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Impact of taste/smell disturbances on dietary intakes and cachexia-related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Koji AmanoDepartment of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1779-6389
Tatsuya MoritaPalliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tomofumi MiuraDepartment of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Naoharu MoriDepartment of Palliative and Supportive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Ryohei TataraDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Osaka City General Hospital, Miyakojima-ku, Osaka, Japan.
Takaomi KessokuDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Yoshinobu MatsudaDepartment of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Osaka, Japan.
Keita TagamiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Hiroyuki OtaniDepartment of Palliative Care Team, and Palliative and Supportive Care, St. Mary's Hospital, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masanori MoriPalliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tomohiko TaniyamaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Nobuhisa NakajimaDivision of Community Medicine and International Medicine, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, Nakagami-gun, Okinawa, Japan.
Erika NakanishiDepartment of Palliative Nursing, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Jun KakoCollege of Nursing Art and Science, University of Hyogo, Akashi, Japan.
Hiroto IshikiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromichi MatsuokaDepartment of Psycho-oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Eriko SatomiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Jane B HopkinsonSchool of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Vickie E BaracosDivision of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Mitsunori MiyashitaDepartment of Palliative Nursing, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 21K10319Sasakawa Health Foundation 2020A-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEating-related distress (ERD) is one type of psychosocial distress among advanced cancer patients and family caregivers. Its alleviation is a key issue in palliative care; however, there is no validated tool for measuring ERD.

methodsThe purpose of this study was to validate tools for evaluating ERD among patients and family caregivers. The study consisted of a development and validation/retest phase. In the development phase, we made preliminary questionnaires for patients and family caregivers. After face validity and content validity, we performed an exploratory factor analysis and discussed the final adoption of items. In the validation/retest phase, we examined factor validity with an exploratory factor analysis. We calculated Pearson's correlation coefficients between the questionnaire for patients, the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy Anorexia Cachexia Subscale (FAACT ACS) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cachexia 24 (EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Pearson's correlation coefficients between the questionnaire for family caregivers and the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) for concurrent validity. We calculated Cronbach's alpha coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for internal consistency and test-retest reliability. We performed the Mann-Whitney U test between the questionnaires and cancer cachexia based on criteria from the international consensus for known-group validity.

resultsIn the development phase, 162 pairs of patients and family caregivers were asked to participate, and 144 patients and 106 family caregivers responded. In the validation/retest phase, 333 pairs of patients and family caregivers were asked to participate, and 234 patients and 152 family caregivers responded. Overall, 183 patients and 112 family caregivers did the retest. Seven conceptual groups were extracted for the ERD among patients and family caregivers, respectively. Patient factors 1-7 correlated with FAACT ACS (r = -0.63, -0.43, -0.55, -0.40, -0.38, -0.54, -0.38, respectively) and EORTC QLQ-CAX24 (r = 0.58, 0.40, 0.60, 0.49, 0.38, 0.59, 0.42, respectively). Family factors 1-7 correlated with CQOLC (r = -0.34, -0.30, -0.37, -0.37, -0.46, -0.42, -0.40, respectively). The values of Cronbach's alpha and ICC of each factor and all factors of patients ranged from 0.84 to 0.96 and 0.67 to 0.83, respectively. Those of each factor and all factors of family caregivers ranged from 0.84 to 0.96 and 0.63 to 0.84, respectively. The cachexia group of patients had significantly higher scores than the non-cachexia group for each factor and all factors.

conclusionsNewly developed tools for measuring ERD experienced by advanced cancer patients and family caregivers have been validated.

Indexed as

AnorexiaNeoplasmsCachexiaHumansQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvanced cancerCachexiaDistressPalliative careQuality of lifeSymptom

Identifiers

PMID36403291
PMCPMC9891939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.