Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36403134›Full record

ArticleCancer science2023

Prognostic effects of the gastric mucosal microbiota in gastric cancer.

Jinpu Yang, Jiaren Xu, Zongxin Ling, Xinxin Zhou, Yongqiang Si, Xiaosun Liu, Feng Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Microbiota and gastric cancer: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Comparative genome analysis of the genusFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jinpu YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jiaren XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Zongxin LingCollaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Xinxin ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yongqiang SiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xiaosun LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3365-2155
Feng JiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81972671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors with a high incidence and mortality. Microbiota play a significant role in human health and disease. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the gastric microbiota in different stomach microhabitats. We used our previously published 16S rRNA gene sequence data. We retrospectively enrolled a cohort of 132 patients with GC with complete prognostic information and selected 78 normal tissues, 49 peritumoral tissues, and 112 tumoral tissues for microbiota analysis. Patients with different prognoses showed different gastric microbiota compositions and diversity. The association network of the abundant gastric microbiota was more complicated in patients with poor prognoses. In the peritumoral microhabitat of patients with good prognoses, Helicobacter was significantly increased, whereas Halomonas and Shewanella were significantly decreased relative to that in the peritumoral microhabitat of patients with poor prognoses. PiCRUSt analysis revealed that the peritumoral microbiota had more different Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways than did the tumoral and normal microbiota. This study evaluated the long-term prognostic value of the gastric mucosal microbiota in patients with GC. These findings suggested that the characteristic alterations of the gastric mucosal microbiota may be markers for clinical outcomes in these patients.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaStomach NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbiomarkersgastric cancergastric microbiotaprognosistumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID36403134
PMCPMC9986079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.