Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36403060›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2022

Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review.

Tamer S Sabet, David B Anderson, Peter W Stubbs, Rachelle Buchbinder, Caroline B Terwee, Alessandro Chiarotto, Joel Gagnier, Arianne P Verhagen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tamer S SabetDiscipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, The University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Tamer.S.Sabet@student.uts.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9482-3846
David B AndersonSydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peter W StubbsDiscipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, The University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rachelle BuchbinderSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Caroline B TerweeDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alessandro ChiarottoDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joel GagnierDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Arianne P VerhagenDiscipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, The University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCore outcome sets (COSs) aim to reduce outcome heterogeneity in clinical practice and research by suggesting a minimum number of agreed-upon outcomes in clinical trials. Most COSs in the musculoskeletal field are developed for specific conditions. We propose that there are likely to be common core domains within existing musculoskeletal COSs that may be used as a starting point in the development of future COSs. We aim to identify common core domains from existing COSs and to facilitate the development of new COSs for musculoskeletal conditions. As a secondary aim, we will assess the development quality of these COSs.

methodsA systematic review including musculoskeletal COSs. We will search Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Methodology Register and International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement (ICHOM). Studies will be included if related to the development of a COS in adults with musculoskeletal conditions and for any type of intervention. Quality will be assessed using the Core Outcome Set-Standards for Development (COS-STAD) recommendations. Data extracted will include scope of the COS, health condition, interventions and outcome domains. Primary outcomes will be all core domains recommended within each COS. We define a common core outcome domain as one present in at least 67% of all COSs. All findings will be summarized and presented using descriptive statistics. DISCUSSION: This systematic review of COSs will describe the core domains recommended within each musculoskeletal COS. Common domains found may be used in the initial stages of development of future musculoskeletal COSs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021239141.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesOutcome Assessment, Health CareHumansSystematic Reviews as TopicCommon outcome domainsCore outcome setsDomainsMusculoskeletalOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID36403060
PMCPMC9675955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.