Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36403026›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroinflammation2022

Peripheral myeloid-derived suppressor cells are good biomarkers of the efficacy of fingolimod in multiple sclerosis.

Celia Camacho-Toledano, Isabel Machín-Díaz, Leticia Calahorra, María Cabañas-Cotillas, David Otaegui, Tamara Castillo-Triviño, Luisa María Villar, Lucienne Costa-Frossard, Manuel Comabella, Luciana Midaglia and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Celia Camacho-ToledanoNeuroimmuno-Repair Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos-SESCAM, Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
Isabel Machín-DíazNeuroimmuno-Repair Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos-SESCAM, Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
Leticia CalahorraNeuroimmuno-Repair Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos-SESCAM, Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
María Cabañas-CotillasNeuroimmuno-Repair Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos-SESCAM, Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
David OtaeguiMultiple Sclerosis Unit, Biodonostia Health Institute, 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Tamara Castillo-TriviñoMultiple Sclerosis Unit, Biodonostia Health Institute, 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Luisa María VillarImmunology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Lucienne Costa-FrossardImmunology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Manuel ComabellaNeurology-Neuroimmunology Service, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Luciana MidagliaNeurology-Neuroimmunology Service, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
José Manuel García-DomínguezMultiple Sclerosis Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Jennifer García-ArochaNeuroimmuno-Repair Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos-SESCAM, Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
María Cristina OrtegaNeuroimmuno-Repair Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos-SESCAM, Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
Diego ClementeNeuroimmuno-Repair Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos-SESCAM, Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain. dclemente@sescam.jccm.es.
Servicio de Salud de Castilla La Mancha · ESHospital Nacional de Parapléjicos · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESInstituto Cajal · ESInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

Esclerosis Múltiple España REEM-EME_2018Esclerosis Múltiple España REEM-EME-S5Fundación Merck Salud FMS_2020_MSInstituto de Salud Carlos III FI19/00132Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI18/00355Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI21/00302Instituto de Salud Carlos III RD16-0015/0019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing number of treatments that are now available to manage patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) highlights the need to develop biomarkers that can be used within the framework of individualized medicine. Fingolimod is a disease-modifying treatment that belongs to the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators. In addition to inhibiting T cell egress from lymph nodes, fingolimod promotes the immunosuppressive activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), whose monocytic subset (M-MDSCs) can be used as a biomarker of disease severity, as well as the degree of demyelination and extent of axonal damage in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS. In the present study, we have assessed whether the abundance of circulating M-MDSCs may represent a useful biomarker of fingolimod efficacy in EAE and in the clinical context of MS patients.

methodsTreatment with vehicle or fingolimod was orally administered to EAE mice for 14 days in an individualized manner, starting the day when each mouse began to develop clinical signs. Peripheral blood from EAE mice was collected previous to treatment and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected from fingolimod to treat MS patients' peripheral blood. In both cases, M-MDSCs abundance was analyzed by flow cytometry and its relationship with the future clinical affectation of each individual animal or patient was assessed.

resultsFingolimod-treated animals presented a milder EAE course with less demyelination and axonal damage, although a few animals did not respond well to treatment and they invariably had fewer M-MDSCs prior to initiating the treatment. Remarkably, M-MDSC abundance was also found to be an important and specific parameter to distinguish EAE mice prone to better fingolimod efficacy. Finally, in a translational effort, M-MDSCs were quantified in MS patients at baseline and correlated with different clinical parameters after 12 months of fingolimod treatment. M-MDSCs at baseline were highly representative of a good therapeutic response to fingolimod, i.e., patients who met at least two of the criteria used to define non-evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) 12 months after treatment.

conclusionOur data indicate that M-MDSCs might be a useful predictive biomarker of the response of MS patients to fingolimod.

Indexed as

Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, ExperimentalMultiple SclerosisMyeloid-Derived Suppressor CellsAnimalsBiomarkersFingolimod HydrochlorideHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearMiceBiomarkersFingolimod HydrochlorideEAEMDSCsPersonalized medicineResponder and non-responderS1PR

Identifiers

PMID36403026
PMCPMC9675277
OpenAlexW4309563011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.