Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36402979›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022

Methods for handling missing data in serially sampled sputum specimens for mycobacterial culture conversion calculation.

Samantha Malatesta, Isabelle R Weir, Sarah E Weber, Tara C Bouton, Tara Carney, Danie Theron, Bronwyn Myers, C Robert Horsburgh, Robin M Warren, Karen R Jacobson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Samantha MalatestaDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02119, USA. samalate@bu.edu.
Isabelle R WeirCenter for Biostatistics in AIDS Research in the Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah E WeberSection of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Tara C BoutonSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Tara CarneyAlcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Danie TheronBrewelskloof Hospital, Worcester, South Africa.
Bronwyn MyersAlcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa.
C Robert HorsburghDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02119, USA.
Robin M WarrenDSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research and South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Cape Town, South Africa.
Karen R JacobsonSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Laura F WhiteDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02119, USA.
Boston University · USBoston Medical Center · USCancer Research And Biostatistics · USGroote Schuur Hospital · ZALife Groenkloof Hospital · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZAStellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

Statistical and Data Management Center for the AIDS Clinical Trials GroupU01AI068634 · NIAID · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HUGHES, MICHAEL DAVID · 2006 to 2010
$71.9M
Transmission Of Tuberculosis Among illicit drug use Linkages (TOTAL)R01AI147316 · NIAID · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI JACOBSON, KAREN R · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
The impact of alcohol consumption on TB treatment outcomesR01AI119037 · NIAID · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI JACOBSON, KAREN R · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
Interdisciplinary Training for BiostatisticiansT32GM074905 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WHITE, LAURA FORSBERG · 2005 to 2019
$3.0M
Maximizing Investigators' Research Award (R35)R35GM141821 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WHITE, LAURA FORSBERG · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
Understanding HIV's impact on RR/MDR-TB development and transmission through genomicsK23AI152930 · NIAID · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI BOUTON, TARA CATHERINE · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI152930NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI119037NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI147316NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068634NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141821NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM074905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe occurrence and timing of mycobacterial culture conversion is used as a proxy for tuberculosis treatment response. When researchers serially sample sputum during tuberculosis studies, contamination or missed visits leads to missing data points. Traditionally, this is managed by ignoring missing data or simple carry-forward techniques. Statistically advanced multiple imputation methods potentially decrease bias and retain sample size and statistical power.

methodsWe analyzed data from 261 participants who provided weekly sputa for the first 12 weeks of tuberculosis treatment. We compared methods for handling missing data points in a longitudinal study with a time-to-event outcome. Our primary outcome was time to culture conversion, defined as two consecutive weeks with no Mycobacterium tuberculosis growth. Methods used to address missing data included: 1) available case analysis, 2) last observation carried forward, and 3) multiple imputation by fully conditional specification. For each method, we calculated the proportion culture converted and used survival analysis to estimate Kaplan-Meier curves, hazard ratios, and restricted mean survival times. We compared methods based on point estimates, confidence intervals, and conclusions to specific research questions.

resultsThe three missing data methods lead to differences in the number of participants achieving conversion; 78 (32.8%) participants converted with available case analysis, 154 (64.7%) converted with last observation carried forward, and 184 (77.1%) converted with multiple imputation. Multiple imputation resulted in smaller point estimates than simple approaches with narrower confidence intervals. The adjusted hazard ratio for smear negative participants was 3.4 (95% CI 2.3, 5.1) using multiple imputation compared to 5.2 (95% CI 3.1, 8.7) using last observation carried forward and 5.0 (95% CI 2.4, 10.6) using available case analysis.

conclusionWe showed that accounting for missing sputum data through multiple imputation, a statistically valid approach under certain conditions, can lead to different conclusions than naïve methods. Careful consideration for how to handle missing data must be taken and be pre-specified prior to analysis. We used data from a TB study to demonstrate these concepts, however, the methods we described are broadly applicable to longitudinal missing data. We provide valuable statistical guidance and code for researchers to appropriately handle missing data in longitudinal studies.

Indexed as

Research DesignSputumBiasData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLongitudinal StudiesCulture conversionLongitudinal missing dataMultiple imputationSurvival analysisTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID36402979
PMCPMC9675206
OpenAlexW4309562533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.