Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36402977›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

Multi-omics to predict changes during cold pressor test.

Lisette J A Kogelman, Madeleine Ernst, Katrine Falkenberg, Gianluca Mazzoni, Julie Courraud, Li Peng Lundgren, Susan Svane Laursen, Arieh Cohen, Jes Olesen, Thomas Folkmann Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisette J A KogelmanDanish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark. Lisette.kogelman@regionh.dk.
Madeleine ErnstSection for Clinical Mass Spectrometry, Danish Center for Neonatal Screening, Department of Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Katrine FalkenbergDanish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
Gianluca MazzoniNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Julie CourraudSection for Clinical Mass Spectrometry, Danish Center for Neonatal Screening, Department of Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Li Peng LundgrenSection for Clinical Mass Spectrometry, Danish Center for Neonatal Screening, Department of Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susan Svane LaursenSection for Clinical Mass Spectrometry, Danish Center for Neonatal Screening, Department of Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Arieh CohenSection for Clinical Mass Spectrometry, Danish Center for Neonatal Screening, Department of Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jes OlesenDanish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
Thomas Folkmann HansenDanish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.

Funding

Candys Foundation CEHEADFP7 Health 602633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cold pressor test (CPT) is a widely used pain provocation test to investigate both pain tolerance and cardiovascular responses. We hypothesize, that performing multi-omic analyses during CPT gives the opportunity to home in on molecular mechanisms involved. Twenty-two females were phenotypically assessed before and after a CPT, and blood samples were taken. RNA-Sequencing, steroid profiling and untargeted metabolomics were performed. Each 'omic level was analyzed separately at both single-feature and systems-level (principal component [PCA] and partial least squares [PLS] regression analysis) and all 'omic levels were combined using an integrative multi-omics approach, all using the paired-sample design.

resultsWe showed that PCA was not able to discriminate time points, while PLS did significantly distinguish time points using metabolomics and/or transcriptomic data, but not using conventional physiological measures. Transcriptomic and metabolomic data revealed at feature-, systems- and integrative- level biologically relevant processes involved during CPT, e.g. lipid metabolism and stress response.

conclusionMulti-omics strategies have a great potential in pain research, both at feature- and systems- level. Therefore, they should be exploited in intervention studies, such as pain provocation tests, to gain knowledge on the biological mechanisms involved in complex traits.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsTranscriptomeHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisPainCold pressor testData integrationMetabolomicsMulti-omicsPCAPLSSystems biologyTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID36402977
PMCPMC9675059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.