Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36402965›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

The impact of funding models on the integration of registered nurses in primary health care teams: protocol for a multi-phase mixed-methods study in Canada.

Maria Mathews, Sarah Spencer, Lindsay Hedden, Julia Lukewich, Marie-Eve Poitras, Emily Gard Marshall, Judith Belle Brown, Shannon Sibbald, Alison A Norful

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria MathewsDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, 1465 Richmond Street, Second Floor, Rm 2140, London, ON, Canada, N6G 2M1. maria.mathews@schulich.uwo.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5174-104X
Sarah SpencerFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, BC, Burnaby, Canada.
Lindsay HeddenFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, BC, Burnaby, Canada.
Julia LukewichFaculty of Nursing, Memorial University, St John's, NL, Canada.
Marie-Eve PoitrasFaculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Emily Gard MarshallDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Judith Belle BrownDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, 1465 Richmond Street, Second Floor, Rm 2140, London, ON, Canada, N6G 2M1.
Shannon SibbaldDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, 1465 Richmond Street, Second Floor, Rm 2140, London, ON, Canada, N6G 2M1.
Alison A NorfulSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Centre for Family Medicine · CASimon Fraser University · CAColumbia University · USDalhousie University · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily practice registered nurses co-managing patient care as healthcare professionals in interdisciplinary primary care teams have been shown to improve access, continuity of care, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes for patients with chronic diseases while being cost-effective. Currently, however, it is unclear how different funding models support or hinder the integration of family practice nurses into existing primary health care systems and interdisciplinary practices. This has resulted in the underutilisation of family practice nurses in contributing to high-quality patient care.

methodsThis mixed-methods project is comprised of three studies: (1) a funding model analysis; (2) case studies; and (3) an online survey with family practice nurses. The funding model analysis will employ policy scans to identify, describe, and compare the various funding models used in Canada to integrate family practice nurses in primary care. Case studies involving qualitative interviews with clinic teams (family practice nurses, physicians, and administrators) and family practice nurse activity logs will explore the variation of nursing professional practice, training, skill set, and team functioning in British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Quebec. Interview transcripts will be analysed thematically and comparisons will be made across funding models. Activity log responses will be analysed to represent nurses' time spent on independent, dependent, interdependent, or non-nursing work in each funding model. Finally, a cross-sectional online survey of family practice nurses in Canada will examine the relationships between funding models, nursing professional practice, training, skill set, team functioning, and patient care co-management in primary care. We will employ bivariate tests and multivariable regression to examine these relationships in the survey results. DISCUSSION: This project aims to address a gap in the literature on funding models for family practice nurses. In particular, findings will support provincial and territorial governments in structuring funding models that optimise the roles of family practice nurses while establishing evidence about the benefits of interdisciplinary team-based care. Overall, the findings may contribute to the integration and optimisation of family practice nursing within primary health care, to the benefit of patients, primary healthcare providers, and health care systems nationally.

Indexed as

Family PracticeNursesBritish ColumbiaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPrimary Health CareFamily practice nurseHealth systemsMixed-methods researchNursingPrimary careResearch design

Identifiers

PMID36402965
PMCPMC9675973
OpenAlexW4309407786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.