Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36402950›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Influences on intentions for obstetric practice among family physicians and residents in Canada: an explorative qualitative inquiry.

Emily Gard Marshall, Kathleen Horrey, Lauren R Moritz, Richard Buote, Agnes Grudniewicz, Laurie J Goldsmith, Ellen Randall, Lori Jones, M Ruth Lavergne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ending the generational blame game: Let us move forward with needed primary care change.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily Gard MarshallPrimary Care Research Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, 1465 Brenton Street, Suite 402, Halifax, NS, B3J 3T4, Canada. Emily.Marshall@Dal.ca.
Kathleen HorreyDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Lauren R MoritzPrimary Care Research Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, 1465 Brenton Street, Suite 402, Halifax, NS, B3J 3T4, Canada.
Richard BuotePrimary Care Research Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, 1465 Brenton Street, Suite 402, Halifax, NS, B3J 3T4, Canada.
Agnes GrudniewiczTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Laurie J GoldsmithFaculty of Health Sciences, Family Medicine and Primary Care, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Ellen RandallSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Lori JonesDepartment of History, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
M Ruth LavergnePrimary Care Research Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, 1465 Brenton Street, Suite 402, Halifax, NS, B3J 3T4, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CASimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

CIHR 155965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany family medicine residency graduates indicate a desire to provide obstetric care, but a low proportion of family physicians (FPs) provide obstetric care within their practice. This suggests personal preference alone may not account for the low proportion of FPs who ultimately provide full obstetric care. If decisionmakers plan to augment the number of FPs providing obstetric care, barriers to the provision of such care must first be identified. Within this paper, we explore the perspectives of both family practice residents and early-career FPs on the factors that shaped their decision to provide obstetric care.

methodsIn this qualitative study, we analyzed a subset of interview data from three Canadian provinces: British Columbia, Ontario, and Nova Scotia (n = 18 family practice residents; n = 39 early-career FPs). We used thematic analysis to analyze data relevant to obstetric care practice, applying the socio-ecological model and comparing themes across participant types, gender, and province.

resultsParticipants described influences affecting their decision about providing obstetric care. Key influencing factors aligned with the levels of the socio-ecological model of public policy (i.e., liability), community (i.e., community needs), organizational (e.g., obstetric care trade-offs, working in teams, sufficient exposure in training), interpersonal practice preferences (i.e., impact on family life, negative interactions with other healthcare professionals), and individual factors (i.e., defining comprehensive care as "everything but obstetrics"). Many participants were interested in providing obstetric care within their practice but did not provide such care. Participants' decision-making around providing or not providing obstetric care included considerations of personal preferences and outside influences.

conclusionsIndividual-level factors alone do not account for the decrease in the type and amount of obstetric care offered by FPs. Instead, FPs' choice to provide or not provide obstetric care is influenced by factors at higher levels of the socio-ecological model. Policymakers who want to encourage obstetric practice by FPs should implement interventions at the public policy, community, organizational, interpersonal, and individual levels.

Indexed as

IntentionPhysicians, FamilyFamily PracticeFemaleHumansOntarioPregnancyQualitative ResearchFamily practiceObstetricsScope of practiceSocio-ecological models

Identifiers

PMID36402950
PMCPMC9675232
OpenAlexW4309550119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.