ArticleSpine deformity2023
A comparative study of supine traction, supine side-bending radiographs, and supine MRI to determine coronal flexibility in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients.
Article in Spine deformity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Curve Flexibility Using Scoliotic Spines Generated From a Generic Spine Model.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Can postoperative Cobb and pelvic obliquity corrections be predicted using supine traction X-rays in non-ambulatory patients with cerebral palsy fused to L5? A case series study.Spine deformity · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare curve correction in degenerative lumbar scoliosis using supine traction radiographs, supine side-bending radiographs, and supine MRI.
methodsA prospective analysis of Cobb angles from patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar scoliosis who underwent supine traction radiography (TR), side-bending radiography (SB), and supine MRI. The Cobb angles at thoracic (T), thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L), and lumbosacral (LS) levels were measured, and the curve correction in percentages compared with standing AP radiography was calculated as corrective flexibility. Differences in curve correction were analyzed.
resultsIn total, 33 patients with an age range of 50-80 years were eligible for inclusion. Traction radiography provided the greatest accuracy in curve correction, with a significant difference from side-bending radiography and supine MRI in T, TL/L, and LS levels (P < 0.001). The difference between side-bending radiography and supine MRI in TL/L and LS levels was not significant (P = 0.721, P = 0.654, respectively). A moderate correlation was found between the corrective flexibility of TR and SB at the T level (0.563, P = 0.001), a strong correlation was observed between the corrective flexibility of TR and SB at the TL/L level (0.709, P < 0.001), and at the TL/L level, a moderate correlation was identified between TR and supine MRI corrective flexibility (0.425, P = 0.014).
conclusionsTraction radiographs significantly outperformed side-bending radiographs and supine MRI in terms of access curve flexibility in degenerative lumbar scoliosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.