ArticleCommunications biology2022
Magnetoencephalography recordings reveal the spatiotemporal dynamics of recognition memory for complex versus simple auditory sequences.
Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Musical and electrical stimulation as intervention in disorder of consciousness (DOC) patients: A randomised cross-over trial.PloS one · 2024Trial
- Brain Network Dynamics of Local and Global Predictive Processing in Aging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Frequency-Specific Neural Dynamics and Decoding of Hierarchical Auditory Sequences Revealed by Magnetoencephalography.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Article
- FREQ-NESS Reveals Age-Related Differences in Frequency-Resolved Brain Networks During Auditory Recognition and Resting State.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Magnetoencephalography in human neuroscience research: planning, piloting, implementation and quality assurance.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Working Memory Predicts Long-Term Recognition of Auditory Sequences: Dissociation Between Confirmed Predictions and Prediction Errors.Scandinavian journal of psychology · 2025Article
- BROAD-NESS Uncovers Dual-Stream Mechanisms Underlying Predictive Coding in Auditory Memory Networks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Impaired non-verbal auditory memory maintenance in schizophrenia: An ERP study.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2025Article
- Core systems of music perception.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
- EEG Correlates of Auditory Short-Term Memory and Dissimilarity Perception in Young and Older Adults.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Multilevel irreversibility reveals higher-order organization of nonequilibrium interactions in human brain dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Age-related neural changes underlying long-term recognition of musical sequences.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Spatiotemporal whole-brain activity and functional connectivity of melodies recognition.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Spatiotemporal brain hierarchies of auditory memory recognition and predictive coding.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Moderate associations betweenHeliyon · 2023Article
- Brain recognition of previously learned versus novel temporal sequences: a differential simultaneous processing.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Whole-brain computation of cognitive versus acoustic errors in music: A mismatch negativity study.Neuroimage. Reports · 2022Article
- Associations between abstract working memory abilities and brain activity underlying long-term recognition of auditory sequences.PNAS nexus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Auditory recognition is a crucial cognitive process that relies on the organization of single elements over time. However, little is known about the spatiotemporal dynamics underlying the conscious recognition of auditory sequences varying in complexity. To study this, we asked 71 participants to learn and recognize simple tonal musical sequences and matched complex atonal sequences while their brain activity was recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Results reveal qualitative changes in neural activity dependent on stimulus complexity: recognition of tonal sequences engages hippocampal and cingulate areas, whereas recognition of atonal sequences mainly activates the auditory processing network. Our findings reveal the involvement of a cortico-subcortical brain network for auditory recognition and support the idea that stimulus complexity qualitatively alters the neural pathways of recognition memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.