ArticleScientific reports2022
Melt electrowriting of PLA, PCL, and composite PLA/PCL scaffolds for tissue engineering application.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Additive Manufacturing for Extracellular Vesicle Therapeutics: Engineering Strategies for Production, Isolation, and Delivery.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Construction and Properties of SPI/PLA-PCL Composite Coating on Pure Titanium Surface.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Multi-hierarchical biofunctional polymeric biomaterial to promote wound closure.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Biological Response to Coating 3D-Printed PLA Scaffolds with Coaxial Gelatin-Based Electrospun Fibers.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Melt Electrowriting High Resolution Poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) Scaffolds for Soft Tissue Engineering.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Hybrid SES-MEW Scaffold Strategies: A Narrative Review of Multi-Scale Fiber Architectures for Soft and Hard Tissue Engineering.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emerging and Prospective Engineering Technologies Enabling Microneedle Based Vaccine Therapeutics.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Green and Scalable Manufacturing of Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds: Solvent-Free Processing, Supercritical COPolymers · 2026Review
- Bioprinting Organs-Science or Fiction?-A Review From Students to Students.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Electrospun PLA/PCL Composite Scaffolds as Platforms for Investigating Colorectal Cancer Cell Plasticity.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Polylactide/Polycaprolactone Nanofiber Scaffold Enhances Primary Cortical Neuron Growth.Polymers · 2026Article
- Rational Design and Functionalization of Melt Electrowritten 4D Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Biomimetic HA-Reinforced PCL/PLA Fibrous Structures via Solution Blow Spinning: Cocoon-Inspired Design for Bone Regeneration.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Advancing 3D scaffold models for metastatic prostate cancer in bone: Materials, manufacture, and future perspectives.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2025Review
- Advanced hydrogel material for colorectal cancer treatment.Drug delivery · 2025Review
- Electrospinning PLLA/PCL Blend Fibre-Based Materials and Their Biomedical Application: A Mini Review.Polymers · 2025Review
- Article
- Fabrication of a low-kink-radius bilayer vascular scaffold incorporating a TPU stent fabricated via melt electrowriting and an electrospun PCL/PU/gelatin layer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Circular Quality of Polymers: Test-Based Evidence for Comparison of Bio-Based and Fossil-Based Polymers.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fabrication of well-ordered and bio-mimetic scaffolds is one of the most important research lines in tissue engineering. Different techniques have been utilized to achieve this goal, however, each method has its own disadvantages. Recently, melt electrowriting (MEW) as a technique for fabrication of well-organized scaffolds has attracted the researchers' attention due to simultaneous use of principles of additive manufacturing and electrohydrodynamic phenomena. In previous research studies, polycaprolactone (PCL) has been mostly used in MEW process. PCL is a biocompatible polymer with characteristics that make it easy to fabricate well-arranged structures using MEW device. However, the mechanical properties of PCL are not favorable for applications like bone tissue engineering. Furthermore, it is of vital importance to demonstrate the capability of MEW technique for processing a broad range of polymers. To address aforementioned problems, in this study, three ten-layered box-structured well-ordered scaffolds, including neat PLA, neat PCL, and PLA/PCL composite are fabricated using an MEW device. Printing of the composite PLA/PCL scaffold using the MEW device is conducted in this study for the first time. The MEW device used in this study is a commercial fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printer which with some changes in its setup and configuration becomes prepared for being used as an MEW device. Since in most of previous studies, a setup has been designed and built for MEW process, the use of the FDM device can be considered as one of the novelties of this research. The printing parameters are adjusted in a way that scaffolds with nearly equal pore sizes in the range of 140 µm to 150 µm are fabricated. However, PCL fibers are mostly narrower (diameters in the range of 5 µm to 15 µm) than PLA fibers with diameters between 15 and 25 µm. Unlike the MEW process of PCL, accurate positioning of PLA fibers is difficult which can be due to higher viscosity of PLA melt compared to PCL melt. The printed composite PLA/PCL scaffold possesses a well-ordered box structure with improved mechanical properties and cell-scaffold interactions compared to both neat PLA and PCL scaffolds. Besides, the composite scaffold exhibits a higher swelling ratio than the neat PCL scaffold which can be related to the presence of less hydrophobic PLA fibers. This scaffold demonstrates an anisotropic behavior during uniaxial tensile test in which its Young's modulus, ultimate tensile stress, and strain to failure all depend on the direction of the applied tensile force. This anisotropy makes the composite PLA/PCL scaffold an exciting candidate for applications in heart tissue engineering. The results of in-vitro cell viability test using L929 mouse murine fibroblast and human umbilical vein endothelial (HUVEC) cells demonstrate that all of the printed scaffolds are biocompatible. In particular, the composite scaffold presents the highest cell viability value among the fabricated scaffolds. All in all, the composite PLA/PCL scaffold shows that it can be a promising substitution for neat PCL scaffold used in previous MEW studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.